Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33732644›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Derivation and Validation of a Prognostic Model for Cancer Dependency Genes Based on CRISPR-Cas9 in Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Wenjie Zhou, Junqing Li, Xiaofang Lu, Fangjie Liu, Tailai An, Xing Xiao, Zi Chong Kuo, Wenhui Wu, Yulong He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Chaperonin in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel roles of METTL1/WDR4 in tumor via mMolecular therapy oncolytics · 2022
    Review
  11. The potential role of NJournal of hematology & oncology · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenjie ZhouDigestive Disease Center, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Junqing LiDigestive Disease Center, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaofang LuDepartment of Pathology, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Fangjie LiuDepartment of Hematology, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Tailai AnDigestive Disease Center, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xing XiaoScientific Research Centre, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Zi Chong KuoDigestive Disease Center, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Wenhui WuDigestive Disease Center, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yulong HeDigestive Disease Center, Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNThe Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a CRISPR-Cas9-based tool to help scientists to investigate gene functions, Cancer Dependency Map genes (CDMs) include an enormous series of loss-of-function screens based on genome-scale RNAi. These genes participate in regulating survival and growth of tumor cells, which suggests their potential as novel therapeutic targets for malignant tumors. By far, studies on the roles of CDMs in gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) are scarce and only a small fraction of CDMs have been investigated. In the present study, datasets of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were extracted from the TCGA-based (The Cancer Genome Atlas) GEPIA database, from which differentially expressed CDMs were determined. Functions and prognostic significance of these verified CDMs were evaluated using a series of bioinformatics methods. In all, 246 differentially expressed CDMs were determined, with 147 upregulated and 99 downregulated. Ten CDMs (ALG8, ATRIP, CCT6A, CFDP1, CINP, MED18, METTL1, ORC1, TANGO6, and PWP2) were identified to be prognosis-related and subsequently a prognosis model based on these ten CDMs was constructed. In comparison with that of patients with low risk in TCGA training, testing and GSE84437 cohort, overall survival (OS) of patients with high risk was significantly worse. It was then subsequently demonstrated that for this prognostic model, area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve was 0.771 and 0.697 for TCGA training and testing cohort respectively, justifying its reliability in predicting survival of GA patients. With the ten identified CDMs, we then constructed a nomogram to generate a clinically practical model. The regulatory networks and functions of the ten CDMs were then explored, the results of which demonstrated that as the gene significantly associated with survival of GA patients and Hazard ratio (HR), PWP2 promoted

Indexed as

Cancer Dependency Mapgastric adenocarcinomainvasion and metastasisprognostic modelTCGA

Identifiers

PMID33732644
PMCPMC7959733
OpenAlexW3131909782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.