ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2021
State of Current Training for Severe Problem Behavior: A Survey.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Practices for the Assessment and Treatment of Severe Problem Behavior: A Colorado-Based Survey.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- A Survey of Procedural-Fidelity Data Collection in Behavior-Analytic Practice.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- Promoting Ethical and Evidence-Based Practice through a Panel Review Process: A Case Study in Implementation Research.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- A Survey of Why and How Clinicians Change Reinforcers during Teaching Sessions.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Article
- A Survey of Barriers Experienced while Providing Supervision via Telehealth: Implications for Future Research and Practice.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Review
- Common Practices used to Establish and Implement Token Economies in Clinical and Instructional Settings: A Survey of BACB Certificants.Behavior analysis in practice · 2023Article
- Toward Socially Meaningful Case Conceptualization: The Risk-Driven Approach.Behavior analysis in practice · 2023Review
- Registered Behavior Technicians' Training Experiences for Severe Problem Behavior: A Survey.Behavior analysis in practice · 2023Article
- Evaluating Professional Behavior Analysts' Literature Searches.Behavior analysis in practice · 2023Article
- Evaluating Sources of Continuing Education and Professional Development Used by Behavior Analysts.Behavior analysis in practice · 2022Article
- Assessing the feasibility of automated virtual reality training of functional analysis procedures for preservice clinicians.Journal of applied behavior analysisArticle
- Teaching trainees to implement functional communication training with multiple schedules: An evaluation of training effects and durability.Journal of applied behavior analysisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensuring that Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs) receive sufficient training in various forms of practice is an area of clinical importance that necessitates additional attention. Given that there is relatively limited information available on the extent to which BCBAs receive ongoing training and support, Reed and Henley (Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 16-26, 2015) conducted a study to evaluate the various types of training offered to BCBAs and aspiring certificants. As such, the purpose of the current investigation was to extend the findings of Reed and Henley by surveying BCBA respondents who practice (a) primarily in the home setting and (b) with clients who engage in severe problem behavior. The results are discussed with respect to 3 socially significant findings. First, 43% of respondents had been assigned their first severe case without initial or ongoing support. Second, only 35.2% of respondents received training on functional analyses more than 1 time. Finally, 5 respondents (4%) answered that the majority of their work was with clients 19 years old or older.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.