Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33732558›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Extensive Aeroportia, Operate or Not to Operate? A Report of a Challenging Case.

Ejaz Latif, Khalid Ahmed, Ahmad Zarour

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ejaz LatifSurgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Khalid AhmedSurgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Ahmad ZarourSurgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Hamad Medical Corporation · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aeroportia is the presence of gas in the portal vein. It is considered an ominous radiological sign with poor outcomes. Historically, it was associated with bowel necrosis, and surgery was mandated in all cases. Herein, we present a challenging case of portal venous gas and its management. An 87-year-old male patient, with multiple co-morbidities, presented with abdominal pain. The computerized tomography (CT) scan showed extensive portal venous gas without evidence of bowel ischemia. Initially, he was managed conservatively, but his clinical condition deteriorated. So, an exploratory laparotomy was performed which revealed multiple superficial splenic abscesses covering the surface of the spleen and a pale segment of jejunum with questionable viability. Splenectomy was performed and second-look laparotomy was planned to assess the small bowel viability. Second-look laparotomy revealed dusky discoloration of 30 cm jejunal segment. The affected segment was resected. The patient improved after surgery and was discharged home. In conclusion, aeroportia (portal venous gas) is a radiological entity. The clinical condition of the patient must be kept in consideration to manage the patients optimally. However, if the patient deteriorates, a high index of suspicion for mesenteric ischemia and early surgical intervention are the keys to save the patients' life.

Indexed as

acute abdomenlaparotomymesenteric ischemiapneumatosis intestinalisportal venous gassplenic abscess

Identifiers

PMID33732558
PMCPMC7955958
OpenAlexW3133410752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.