ReviewFood science and biotechnology2021
Recent (2011-2017) foodborne outbreak cases in the Republic of Korea compared to the United States: a review.
Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiological Trends, Statistical Correlations, and Forecasting of Notifiable Infectious Diseases in South Korea, 2001-2024: A Regression and Time Series Analysis with Projections to 2028.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Foodborne disease outbreaks before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Jiangsu Province, China.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Assessing risk factors for foodborne illness in restaurants in Seoul.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- A Dual-Recognition Electrochemical Sensor Using Bacteria-Imprinted Polymer and Concanavalin A for Sensitive and Selective Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating the capacity of magnetic ionic liquids for separation and concentration of non-enveloped viral particles and free viral genomic RNA.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Neem (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Investigating processing practices and microbiological quality of minimally processed vegetables in Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for the Multiple Detection and Identification of Pathogens in Fermented Foods.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Impact and prospect of the fourth industrial revolution in food safety: Mini-review.Food science and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Surveillance for foodborne disease outbreaks in Zhejiang Province, China, 2015-2020.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Bacterial Biofilms and Their Implications in Pathogenesis and Food Safety.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study analyzes and compares foodborne disease outbreaks reported in the Republic of Korea (KR) and the United States (US) during 2011-2017. The foodborne outbreaks data in the KR and the US were collected from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety and from the Surveillance for Foodborne Disease Outbreaks United States, respectively. The average number of outbreaks and illness population were higher in the US than in the KR, but the KR's illness ratio considering population size was 2.4 times higher than that of the US. When the sites of outbreaks compared, the number of illness was the highest at schools in the KR whereas outbreaks at restaurants were more frequent in the US. In the KR, bacterial infections were the primary cause of outbreaks while bacterial and viral infections accounted for the largest share of outbreaks in the US. Specifically, pathogenic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.