ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2021
A comparative study of autogenous, allograft and artificial bone substitutes on bone regeneration and immunotoxicity in rat femur defect model.
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of Dimethyloxalylglycine on Stem Cells Osteogenic Differentiation and Bone Tissue Regeneration-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Polyphosphate in Bone Tissue Engineering: From Molecular Mechanisms to Material Design.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Efficacy of calcium sulfate particles combined with allogeneic bone grafting on bone defects after surgery for benign bone tumors of the extremities.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- An all-in-one injectable biocement: self-setting magnesium phosphate for bone repair, fracture adhesion and osteoporotic fixation.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- The impact of catalpol on osteogenic differentiation of the jaw bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on the basis of network pharmacology, molecular docking and experimental validation.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- 3D-printed vancomycin-eluting PGCL/MXene bifunctional scaffold for management of infected bone defects.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Enhancement of in vitro and in vivo bone repair performance of decalcified bone/gelma by desferrioxamine.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds for bone defect repair: bone aging and immune regulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- 3D printed scaffolds with multistage osteogenic activity for bone defect repair.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Article
- Osteogenically committed hUCMSCs-derived exosomes promote the recovery of critical-sized bone defects with enhanced osteogenic properties.APL bioengineering · 2024Article
- Surface demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft followed by reimplantation in a failed mandibular dental implant.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- In vitro comparison of the osteogenic capability of human pulp stem cells on alloplastic, allogeneic, and xenogeneic bone scaffolds.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Customized bioceramic scaffolds and metal meshes for challenging large-size mandibular bone defect regeneration and repair.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Article
- SrFeMaterials today. Bio · 2022Article
- A sustained release of BMP2 in urine-derived stem cells enhances the osteogenic differentiation and the potential of bone regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Article
- Recent advances in regenerative biomaterials.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repair and reconstruction of large bone defect were often difficult, and bone substitute materials, including autogenous bone, allogenic bone and artificial bone, were common treatment strategies. The key to elucidate the clinical effect of these bone repair materials was to study their osteogenic capacity and immunotoxicological compatibility. In this paper, the mechanical properties, micro-CT imaging analysis, digital image analysis and histological slice analysis of the three bone grafts were investigated and compared after different time points of implantation in rat femur defect model. Autogenous bone and biphasic calcium phosphate particular artificial bone containing 61.4% HA and 38.6% β-tricalcium phosphate with 61.64% porosity and 0.8617 ± 0.0068 g/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.