Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33732459›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational immunology2021

Antibodies to neutralising epitopes synergistically block the interaction of the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE 2.

Manisha Pandey, Victoria Ozberk, Sharareh Eskandari, Ahmed O Shalash, Michael A Joyce, Holly A Saffran, Christopher J Day, Ailin Lepletier, Belinda L Spillings, Jamie-Lee Mills and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Manisha PandeyInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4151-699X
Victoria OzberkInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Sharareh EskandariInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Ahmed O ShalashUniversity of Queensland Brisbane QLD Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3819-4798
Michael A JoyceUniversity of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.
Holly A SaffranUniversity of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.
Christopher J DayInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Ailin LepletierInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1371-7313
Belinda L SpillingsInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Jamie-Lee MillsInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Ainslie CalcuttInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Fan FanOlymvax Biopharmaceuticals Chengdu China.
James T WilliamsGold Coast Hospital and Health Service Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Danielle I StanisicInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Laetitia HattinghGold Coast Hospital and Health Service Gold Coast QLD Australia.
John GerrardGold Coast Hospital and Health Service Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Mariusz SkwarczynskiUniversity of Queensland Brisbane QLD Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7257-807X
Johnson MakInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Michael P JenningsInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Istvan TothUniversity of Queensland Brisbane QLD Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4572-397X
D Lorne TyrrellUniversity of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada.
Michael F GoodInstitute for Glycomics Griffith University Gold Coast QLD Australia.
Griffith University · AUGold Coast Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA major COVID-19 vaccine strategy is to induce antibodies that prevent interaction between the Spike protein's receptor-binding domain (RBD) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). These vaccines will also induce T-cell responses. However, concerns were raised that aberrant vaccine-induced immune responses may exacerbate disease. We aimed to identify minimal epitopes on the RBD that would induce antibody responses that block the interaction of the RBD and ACE2 as a strategy leading to an effective vaccine with reduced risk of inducing immunopathology.

methodsWe procured a series of overlapping 20-amino acid peptides spanning the RBD and asked which were recognised by plasma from COVID-19 convalescent patients. Identified epitopes were conjugated to diphtheria-toxoid and used to vaccinate mice. Immune sera were tested for binding to the RBD and for their ability to block the interaction of the RBD and ACE2.

resultsSeven putative vaccine epitopes were identified. Memory B-cells (MBCs) specific for one of the epitopes were identified in the blood of convalescent patients. When used to vaccinate mice, six induced antibodies that bound recRBD and three induced antibodies that could partially block the interaction of the RBD and ACE2. However, when the sera were combined in pairs, we observed significantly enhanced inhibition of binding of RBD to ACE2. Two of the peptides were located in the main regions of the RBD known to contact ACE2. Of significant importance to vaccine development, two of the peptides were in regions that are invariant in the UK and South African strains.

conclusionCOVID-19 convalescent patients have SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and MBCs, the specificities of which can be defined with short peptides. Epitope-specific antibodies synergistically block RBD-ACE2 interaction.

Indexed as

ACE‐2memory B cellspeptide epitopesreceptor‐binding domainSARS‐CoV‐2tetramer stainingvaccine

Identifiers

PMID33732459
PMCPMC7937407
OpenAlexW3135880646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.