ArticleBiomicrofluidics2021
Automated calibration of 3D-printed microfluidic devices based on computer vision.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated design of a 3D passive microfluidic particle sorter.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Article
- Microsystem Advances through Integration with Artificial Intelligence.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Organ-on-a-chip meets artificial intelligence in drug evaluation.Theranostics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development of 3D printing techniques, the application of it in microfluidic/Lab-on-a-Chip (LoC) fabrication is becoming more and more attractive. However, to achieve a satisfying printing quality of the target devices, researchers usually require quite an amount of work in calibration trials even for high-end 3D printers. To increase the calibration efficiency of the average priced printers and promote the application of 3D printing technology in the microfluidic community, this work has presented a computer vision (CV)-based method for rapid and precise 3D printing calibration with examples on cylindrical hole/post diameters of 0.2-2.4 mm and rectangular hole/post widths of 0.2-1.0 mm by a stereolithography-based 3D printer. Our method is fully automated, which contains five steps and only needs a camera at hand to provide photos for convolutional neural network recognition. The experimental results showed that our CV-based method could provide calibrated dimensions with just one print of the specific calibration ruler to meet user desire. The higher resolution of the photo provides a higher precision in calibration. Subsequently, only one more print for the target device is needed after the calibration process. Overall, this work has provided a quick and precise calibration tool for researchers to apply 3D printing in the fabrication of their microfluidic/LoC devices with average price printers. Besides, with our open source calibration software and calibration ruler design file, researchers can modify the specific setting based on customized needs and conduct calibration on any type of 3D printer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.