Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33732048›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2021

Identification and probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria from camel milk.

Anjali Sharma, Meeta Lavania, Raghvendar Singh, Banwari Lal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Investigation of Probiotic Properties ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  9. Accurate identification ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Functional characterization and biotechnological applications of exopolysaccharides produced by newly isolated Enterococcus hirae MLG3-25-1.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Camel milkFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Isolation, characterization of Weissella confusa and Lactococcus lactis from different milk sources and determination of probiotic features.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anjali SharmaMicrobial Biotechnology, Environmental and Industrial Biotechnology Division, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), New Delhi, India.
Meeta LavaniaMicrobial Biotechnology, Environmental and Industrial Biotechnology Division, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), New Delhi, India.
Raghvendar SinghDepartment of Biochemistry, National Research Centre on Camel, Jorbeer, Bikaner, India.
Banwari LalMicrobial Biotechnology, Environmental and Industrial Biotechnology Division, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, a total of 80 presumed lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated from camel milk. Selected LAB were identified as

Indexed as

Caco-2 cell lineCamel milkIn vitro studiesLactic acid bacteriaProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID33732048
PMCPMC7938203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.