ArticleThe pharmacogenomics journal2021
A survey of cancer genome signatures identifies genes connected to distinct chromosomal instability phenotypes.
Article in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- OTU deubiquitinase, ubiquitin aldehyde binding 2 (OTUB2) modulates the stemness feature, chemoresistance, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of colon cancer via regulating GINS complex subunit 1 (GINS1) expression.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Article
- Complementary biomarkers of computed tomography for diagnostic grading of gastric cancer: DSCC1 and GINS1.Aging · 2024Article
- A correlation graph attention network for classifying chromosomal instabilities from histopathology whole-slide images.iScience · 2023Article
- Recent advances in targeted drug delivery systems for resistant colorectal cancer.Cancer cell international · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Certain breast and ovarian cancers are characterised by high levels of chromosomal instability. We established a suite of eleven SNP array-based signatures of various forms of chromosomal instability. To understand what biological mechanisms might underpin these signatures, we generated and assembled genetic-feature data including allele-specific expression, fusion genes, gene expression, methylation, somatic coding mutations and protein expression. For each signature, we extracted a compendium of significantly associated genetic features using machine learning. We established an association between subchromosomal allelic imbalance-based measures and DNA repair genes. Numerical chromosomal instability and chromothripsis were found to have distinct genetic associations but shared a relationship to mitotic processes, while whole-genome doubling was characterised by TP53 mutation, and high AURKA and GINS1 expression. Furthermore, we identified two genetically distinct forms of tandem duplicator phenotypes. These findings identify potentially novel genomic targets for validation and drug development for specific subsets of breast and ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.