Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731846›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Awake suppression after brief exposure to a familiar stimulus.

Ji Won Bang, Dobromir Rahnev

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ji Won BangSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. JiWon.Bang@nyulangone.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9739-3474
Dobromir RahnevSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5265-2559

Funding

Uncovering the Architecture of MetacognitionR01MH119189 · NIMH · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI RAHNEV, DOBROMIR · 2020 to 2024
$1.5M
Improving behavior with TMS: A concurrent TMS-fMRI approachR21MH122825 · NIMH · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI RAHNEV, DOBROMIR · 2020 to 2021
$434k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119189NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH122825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newly learned information undergoes a process of awake reactivation shortly after the learning offset and we recently demonstrated that this effect can be observed as early as area V1. However, reactivating all experiences can be wasteful and unnecessary, especially for familiar stimuli. Therefore, here we tested whether awake reactivation occurs differentially for new and familiar stimuli. Subjects completed a brief visual task on a stimulus that was either novel or highly familiar due to extensive prior training on it. Replicating our previous results, we found that awake reactivation occurred in V1 for the novel stimulus. On the other hand, brief exposure to the familiar stimulus led to 'awake suppression' such that neural activity patterns immediately after exposure to the familiar stimulus diverged from the patterns associated with that stimulus. Further, awake reactivation was observed selectively in V1, whereas awake suppression had similar strength across areas V1-V3. These results are consistent with the presence of a competition between local awake reactivation and top-down awake suppression, with suppression becoming dominant for familiar stimuli.

Indexed as

Brain WavesNeuronal PlasticityPhotic StimulationRecognition, PsychologyVisual PerceptionWakefulnessAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleVisual CortexVisual PathwaysYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33731846
PMCPMC7969731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.