Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731845›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2021

Targeting FAK in anticancer combination therapies.

John C Dawson, Alan Serrels, Dwayne G Stupack, David D Schlaepfer, Margaret C Frame

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed
34.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed, 373 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and Safety of Avutometinib ± Defactinib in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Primary Analysis of ENGOT-OV60/GOG-3052/RAMP 201.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tumor FAK supports fibrillar collagen expression in ovarian cancer ascites.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. ReducedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

John C DawsonCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. john.c.dawson@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5713-1026
Alan SerrelsCentre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Dwayne G StupackDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Centre, La Jolla, CA, USA.
David D SchlaepferDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Centre, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Margaret C FrameCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. m.frame@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5882-1942
Edinburgh Cancer Research · GBUniversity of California San Diego · USCentre for Inflammation Research · GB

Funding

Dissecting FAK-regulated oncogenic signaling programs in ovarian cancerR01CA247562 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SCHLAEPFER, DAVID D, STUPACK, DWAYNE G. · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
Reprogramming the Tumor Microenvironment in Ovarian CancerR01CA254342 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SCHLAEPFER, DAVID D · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
Cancer Research UK 24837Cancer Research UK 25919Cancer Research UK C157/A24837Cancer Research UK C39669/A25919Cancer Research UK C42454/A28596NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247562NCI NIH HHS R01 CA254342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is both a non-receptor tyrosine kinase and an adaptor protein that primarily regulates adhesion signalling and cell migration, but FAK can also promote cell survival in response to stress. FAK is commonly overexpressed in cancer and is considered a high-value druggable target, with multiple FAK inhibitors currently in development. Evidence suggests that in the clinical setting, FAK targeting will be most effective in combination with other agents so as to reverse failure of chemotherapies or targeted therapies and enhance efficacy of immune-based treatments of solid tumours. Here, we discuss the recent preclinical evidence that implicates FAK in anticancer therapeutic resistance, leading to the view that FAK inhibitors will have their greatest utility as combination therapies in selected patient populations.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFocal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine KinasesHumansNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsFocal Adhesion Protein-Tyrosine KinasesProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33731845
PMCPMC8276817
OpenAlexW3137382409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.