Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731838›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2021

Social networks strongly predict the gut microbiota of wild mice.

Aura Raulo, Bryony E Allen, Tanya Troitsky, Arild Husby, Josh A Firth, Tim Coulson, Sarah C L Knowles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A host of issues: pseudoreplication in host-microbiota studies.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. The island biology of the host microbiome.Trends in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gut Microbiome of Two Rodent Species (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. DRIVERS OF VARIATION OF THE ZEBRAFISH EGG MICROBIOME.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aura RauloDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. aura.raulo@zoo.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4860-7840
Bryony E AllenInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Tanya TroitskyFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8394-6229
Arild HusbyDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Josh A FirthDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Tim CoulsonDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah C L KnowlesDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. sarah.knowles@zoo.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2368-4623

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S009752/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian gut teems with microbes, yet how hosts acquire these symbionts remains poorly understood. Research in primates suggests that microbes can be picked up via social contact, but the role of social interactions in non-group-living species remains underexplored. Here, we use a passive tracking system to collect high resolution spatiotemporal activity data from wild mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). Social network analysis revealed social association strength to be the strongest predictor of microbiota similarity among individuals, controlling for factors including spatial proximity and kinship, which had far smaller or nonsignificant effects. This social effect was limited to interactions involving males (male-male and male-female), implicating sex-dependent behaviours as driving processes. Social network position also predicted microbiota richness, with well-connected individuals having the most diverse microbiotas. Overall, these findings suggest social contact provides a key transmission pathway for gut symbionts even in relatively asocial mammals, that strongly shapes the adult gut microbiota. This work underlines the potential for individuals to pick up beneficial symbionts as well as pathogens from social interactions.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsFemaleMaleMammalsMiceSocial Networking

Identifiers

PMID33731838
PMCPMC8397773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.