Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731817›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2021

Pediatric literature trends: high-level analysis using text-mining.

Sarina Levy-Mendelovich, Yiftach Barbash, Ivan Budnik, Daniella Levy-Erez, Raz Somech, Shelly Soffer, Susan Furth, Eyal Klang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarina Levy-MendelovichSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Levysarina@gmail.com.
Yiftach BarbashSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ivan BudnikDepartment of Pathophysiology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Daniella Levy-ErezSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Raz SomechSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Shelly SofferSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Susan FurthDivision of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eyal KlangSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric research is a diverse field that is constantly growing. Current machine learning advancements have prompted a technique termed text-mining. In text-mining, information is extracted from texts using algorithms. This technique can be applied to analyze trends and to investigate the dynamics in a research field. We aimed to use text-mining to provide a high-level analysis of pediatric literature over the past two decades.

methodsWe retrieved all available MEDLINE/PubMed annual data sets until December 31, 2018. Included studies were categorized into topics using text-mining.

resultsTwo hundred and twenty-five journals were categorized as Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health based on Scimago ranking for medicine journals. We included 201,141 pediatric papers published between 1999 and 2018. The most frequently cited publications were clinical guidelines and meta-analyses. We found that there is a shift in the trend of topics. Epidemiological studies are gaining more publications while other topics are relatively decreasing.

conclusionsThe topics in pediatric literature have shifted in the past two decades, reflecting changing trends in the field. Text-mining enables analysis of trends in publications and can serve as a high-level academic tool. IMPACT: Text-mining enables analysis of trends in publications and can serve as a high-level academic tool. This is the first study using text-mining techniques to analyze pediatric publications. Our findings indicate that text-mining techniques enable better understanding of trends in publications and should be implemented when analyzing research.

Indexed as

PediatricsAlgorithmsData MiningHumansPublicationsPubMed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.