Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731737›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Vaginal microbiome and serum metabolite differences in late gestation commercial sows at risk for pelvic organ prolapse.

Zoë E Kiefer, Lucas R Koester, Lucas Showman, Jamie M Studer, Amanda L Chipman, Aileen F Keating, Stephan Schmitz-Esser, Jason W Ross

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Managing Reproduction in Hyperprolific Sow Herds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  11. Current practice in animal models for pelvic floor dysfunction.International urogynecology journal · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zoë E KieferDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Iowa State University, 2356 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Lucas R KoesterDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Lucas ShowmanW. M. Keck Metabolomics Research Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Jamie M StuderDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Iowa State University, 2356 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Amanda L ChipmanIowa Pork Industry Center, Ames, IA, USA.
Aileen F KeatingDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Iowa State University, 2356 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Stephan Schmitz-EsserDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Iowa State University, 2356 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Jason W RossDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Iowa State University, 2356 Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA. jwross@iastate.edu.
Iowa State University · USNational Pork Board · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sow mortality attributable to pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has increased in the U.S. swine industry and continues to worsen. Two main objectives of this study were, (1) to develop a perineal scoring system that can be correlated with POP risk, and (2) identify POP risk-associated biological factors. To assess POP risk during late gestation, sows (n = 213) were scored using a newly developed perineal scoring (PS) system. Sows scored as PS1 (low), PS2 (moderate), or PS3 (high) based on POP risk. Subsequently, 1.5, 0.8, and 23.1% of sows scored PS1, PS2, or PS3, respectively, experienced POP. To identify biomarkers, serum and vaginal swabs were collected from late gestation sows differing in PS. Using GC-MS, 82 serum metabolite differences between PS1 and PS3 animals (P < 0.05) were identified. Vaginal swabs were utilized for 16S rRNA gene sequencing and differences in vaginal microbiomes between PS1 and PS3 animals were detected on a community level (P < 0.01) along with differences in abundances of 89 operational taxonomic units (P < 0.05). Collectively, these data demonstrate that sows with greater POP risk have differential serum metabolites and vaginal microflora. Additionally, an initial and novel characterization of the sow vaginal microbiome was determined.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPelvic Organ ProlapseAnimalsBiomarkersFemaleGestational AgeRisk FactorsSwineBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33731737
PMCPMC7969946
OpenAlexW3138859357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.