Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731724›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

A conserved immunogenic and vulnerable site on the coronavirus spike protein delineated by cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies.

Chunyan Wang, Rien van Haperen, Javier Gutiérrez-Álvarez, Wentao Li, Nisreen M A Okba, Irina Albulescu, Ivy Widjaja, Brenda van Dieren, Raul Fernandez-Delgado, Isabel Sola and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 204 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chunyan WangDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Rien van HaperenDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Javier Gutiérrez-ÁlvarezDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, National Center for Biotechnology-Spanish National Research Council (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0690-9496
Wentao LiDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-762X
Nisreen M A OkbaDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2394-1079
Irina AlbulescuDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ivy WidjajaDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Brenda van DierenDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Raul Fernandez-DelgadoDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, National Center for Biotechnology-Spanish National Research Council (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-9010
Isabel SolaDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, National Center for Biotechnology-Spanish National Research Council (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5704-1917
Daniel L HurdissDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3834-5808
Olalekan DaramolaCell Culture and Fermentation Sciences, Biopharmaceutical Development, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Frank GrosveldDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Frank J M van KuppeveldDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-749X
Bart L HaagmansDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-2015
Luis EnjuanesDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, National Center for Biotechnology-Spanish National Research Council (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Dubravka DrabekDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9781-1701
Berend-Jan BoschDivision of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. b.j.bosch@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3864-232X
Utrecht University · NLErasmus MC · NLConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus spike glycoprotein, located on the virion surface, is the key mediator of cell entry and the focus for development of protective antibodies and vaccines. Structural studies show exposed sites on the spike trimer that might be targeted by antibodies with cross-species specificity. Here we isolated two human monoclonal antibodies from immunized humanized mice that display a remarkable cross-reactivity against distinct spike proteins of betacoronaviruses including SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV and the endemic human coronavirus HCoV-OC43. Both cross-reactive antibodies target the stem helix in the spike S2 fusion subunit which, in the prefusion conformation of trimeric spike, forms a surface exposed membrane-proximal helical bundle. Both antibodies block MERS-CoV infection in cells and provide protection to mice from lethal MERS-CoV challenge in prophylactic and/or therapeutic models. Our work highlights an immunogenic and vulnerable site on the betacoronavirus spike protein enabling elicitation of antibodies with unusual binding breadth.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBetacoronavirusCamelusCoronavirus InfectionsCross ReactionsEpitopesHumansMiceProtein ConformationProtein SubunitsSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEpitopesProtein SubunitsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID33731724
PMCPMC7969777
OpenAlexW3136693147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.