Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731718›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Long-distance electron transfer in a filamentous Gram-positive bacterium.

Yonggang Yang, Zegao Wang, Cuifen Gan, Lasse Hyldgaard Klausen, Robin Bonné, Guannan Kong, Dizhou Luo, Mathijs Meert, Chunjie Zhu, Guoping Sun and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A synthetic method to assay polycystin channel biophysics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. NonelectroactiveISME communications · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yonggang YangInstitute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Zegao WangInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research (SDC), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Cuifen GanInstitute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Lasse Hyldgaard KlausenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research (SDC), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3004-5958
Robin BonnéX-LAB, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1659-1127
Guannan KongInstitute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Dizhou LuoInstitute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Mathijs MeertX-LAB, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Chunjie ZhuInstitute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Guoping SunInstitute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Jun GuoState Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Guangzhou, China.
Yuxin MaSchool of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jesper Tataru BjergCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jean MancaX-LAB, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-0308
Meiying XuInstitute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China. xumy@gdim.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7276-4219
Lars Peter NielsenCenter for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7269-4860
Mingdong DongInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research (SDC), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. dong@inano.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2025-2171

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-distance extracellular electron transfer has been observed in Gram-negative bacteria and plays roles in both natural and engineering processes. The electron transfer can be mediated by conductive protein appendages (in short unicellular bacteria such as Geobacter species) or by conductive cell envelopes (in filamentous multicellular cable bacteria). Here we show that Lysinibacillus varians GY32, a filamentous unicellular Gram-positive bacterium, is capable of bidirectional extracellular electron transfer. In microbial fuel cells, L. varians can form centimetre-range conductive cellular networks and, when grown on graphite electrodes, the cells can reach a remarkable length of 1.08 mm. Atomic force microscopy and microelectrode analyses suggest that the conductivity is linked to pili-like protein appendages. Our results show that long-distance electron transfer is not limited to Gram-negative bacteria.

Indexed as

BacillaceaeBioelectric Energy SourcesElectric ConductivityElectrodesElectron TransportFimbriae, BacterialGram-Positive BacteriaGraphiteMicroscopy, Atomic ForceNanowiresGraphite

Identifiers

PMID33731718
PMCPMC7969598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.