Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731383›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

High-dose electronic media use in five-year-olds and its association with their psychosocial symptoms: a cohort study.

Janette Niiranen, Olli Kiviruusu, Riitta Vornanen, Outi Saarenpää-Heikkilä, E Juulia Paavonen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Janette NiiranenDepartment of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2473-7878
Olli KiviruusuDepartment of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4864-8378
Riitta VornanenDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1600-3893
Outi Saarenpää-HeikkiläCenter for Child Health Research, Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-5888
E Juulia PaavonenDepartment of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland juulia.paavonen@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1421-9877
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FITampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study investigated the frequency of electronic media (e-media) usage by preschool children and the risks of high-dose e-media use on young children's psychosocial well-being.

designLongitudinal associations between e-media use at 18 months and psychosocial symptoms at 5 years of age were studied, as well as cross-sectional associations between e-media use and psychosocial symptoms at 5 years.

settingBetween 2011 and 2017 in Finland.

participantsChildren aged 5 years (n=699). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Children's psychosocial symptoms were determined at the age of 5 years using the parent-reported questionnaires Five-to-Fifteen (FTF) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).

resultsBased on our results, 95% of the preschool children exceeded the daily recommended use of e-media set by health professionals. Our results indicate that increased screen time at 5 years of age is associated with a risk of multiple psychosocial symptoms (OR 1.53-2.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.34, p<0.05), while increased levels of e-media use at 18 months was only associated with FTF peer problems (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.41, p=0.03). Moreover, high-dose use of electronic games at the age of 5 years seems to be associated with fewer risks for psychosocial well-being than programme viewing, as it was only associated with SDQ hyperactivity (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.51, p=0.02).

conclusionIncreased screen time has multiple risks for children's psychosocial well-being. These risk factors seem to be significant in the long term, and are related to problems in children's socio-emotional development later on. Health professionals and paediatricians have an important role as communicators of the current research results on the safe usage time of e-media for families, and enhancing parents' skills as regulators of children's safe e-media use. More research is needed on the family conditions of high-dose e-media users.

Indexed as

ElectronicsChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFinlandHumansSurveys and Questionnaireschild & adolescent psychiatrycommunity child healthepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID33731383
PMCPMC7978091
OpenAlexW3136672434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.