Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731319›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine and community health2021

Communities and service providers address access to perinatal care in postconflict Northern Uganda: socialising evidence for participatory action.

Loubna Belaid, Pamela Atim, Eunice Atim, Emmanuel Ochola, Martin Ogwang, Pontius Bayo, Janet Oola, Isaac Wonyima Okello, Ivan Sarmiento, Laura Rojas-Rozo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine and community health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Fuzzy cognitive mapping in participatory research and decision making: a practice review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Loubna BelaidCIET/ PRAM Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada lbelaid@ciet.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0550-0560
Pamela AtimPublic Health, Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda.
Eunice AtimMaternal and child health, Nwoya Health District, Nwoya, Uganda.
Emmanuel OcholaSt Mary's Lacor Hospital, Gulu, Uganda.
Martin OgwangSt Mary's Lacor Hospital, Gulu, Uganda.
Pontius BayoSt Mary's Lacor Hospital, Gulu, Uganda.
Janet OolaMaternal and child health, Nwoya Health District, Nwoya, Uganda.
Isaac Wonyima OkelloMaternal and child health, Nwoya Health District, Nwoya, Uganda.
Ivan SarmientoFamily Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Laura Rojas-RozoFamily Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Kate ZinszerPreventive and social medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Christina ZarowskyPreventive and social medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Neil AnderssonCIET/ PRAM Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDescribe participatory codesign of interventions to improve access to perinatal care services in Northern Uganda. STUDY

designMixed-methods participatory research to codesign increased access to perinatal care. Fuzzy cognitive mapping, focus groups and a household survey identified and documented the extent of obstructions to access. Deliberative dialogue focused stakeholder discussions of this evidence to address the obstacles to access. Most significant change stories explored the participant experience of this process.

settingThree parishes in Nwoya district in the Gulu region, Northern Uganda.

participantsPurposively sampled groups of women, men, female youth, male youth, community health workers, traditional midwives and service providers. Each of seven stakeholder categories included 5-8 participants in each of three parishes.

resultsStakeholders identified several obstructions to accessing perinatal care: lack of savings in preparation for childbirth in facility costs, lack of male support and poor service provider attitudes. They suggested joining saving groups, practising saving money and income generation to address the short-term financial shortfall.They recommended increasing spousal awareness of perinatal care and they proposed improving service provider attitudes. Participants described their own improved care-seeking behaviour and patient-provider relationships as short-term gains of the codesign.

conclusionParticipatory service improvement is feasible and acceptable in postconflict settings like Northern Uganda. Engaging communities in identifying perinatal service delivery issues and reflecting on local evidence about these issues generate workable community-led solutions and increases trust between community members and service providers.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePerinatal CareAdolescentChildCommunity Health WorkersFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyUgandacommunity-based participatory researchglobal healthhealth servicesmaternal health

Identifiers

PMID33731319
PMCPMC7978070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.