Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731216›Full record

ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale2021

Prospective cohort study of voice outcomes following secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in gastric pull-up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy.

Emily C Deane, Harman Parhar, Linda Rammage, Amanda Hu, Donald W Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily C DeaneDivision of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, 4th Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada.
Harman ParharDivision of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, 4th Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada.
Linda RammageDivision of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, 4th Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada.
Amanda HuDivision of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, 4th Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada. amanda.hu@vch.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1292-1582
Donald W AndersonDivision of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, 4th Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

University of British Columbia F18-04668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric pull-up is a reconstructive option for circumferential defects after resection of advanced laryngopharyngeal malignancy. Voice loss is expected and vocal rehabilitation remains a challenge. Our study objectives were to investigate the feasibility of secondary tracheoesophageal puncture following gastric pull-up and to analyze voice outcomes.

methodsThis was a prospective cohort study of patients with advanced laryngopharyngeal malignancies who underwent gastric pull-up and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture between 1988 and 2017 at a tertiary-care academic institution. Objective acoustic measures included fundamental frequency and vocal intensity. Perceptual analysis was performed using voice recordings ("Rainbow Passage") randomly presented in a blinded fashion to four clinicians using the validated GRBAS scale. Speech intelligibility was assessed in a blinded fashion using a validated 7-point scale. Additionally, the Voice Handicap Index-10 was administered as a validated patient self-reporting tool.

resultsTen patients (7 male, 3 female) were included, all of whom preferentially used tracheoesophageal puncture for communication. These patients had abnormal median fundamental frequency of 250 (interquartile range (IQR) 214-265) Hz and a limited median vocal intensity of 65.8 (IQR 64.1-68.3) dB. Perceptual analysis (GRBAS) revealed a median 'moderate' degree of impairment [grade 2 (IQR 2-3), roughness 2 (IQR 2-3), breathiness 3 (IQR 2-3), asthenia 2 (IQR 1-2), strain 2 (IQR 1-2)] as did median intelligibility scores [median 5 (IQR 4-7)]. Most patients self-reported an abnormal voice handicap-10 [median 26.5 (IQR 22.8-35.0)].

conclusionSecondary tracheoesophageal puncture is a safe and feasible option for voice rehabilitation after gastric pull-up. Although analyses demonstrated moderate subjective and objective impairment, tracheoesophageal puncture provided patients with a self-reported means of functional verbal communication and was their preferred method of communication.

Indexed as

Speech IntelligibilityVoice QualityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEsophagectomyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLaryngeal NeoplasmsLaryngectomyMaleMiddle AgedPharyngectomyProspective StudiesPuncturesGastric pull-upLaryngopharyngoesophagectomyQuality of lifeVoice

Identifiers

PMID33731216
PMCPMC7968292
OpenAlexW3137661095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.