Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731190›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2021

Exploring use of activity monitors for patients with obesity during weight-loss treatment - a qualitative study.

Ingrid S Følling, Line M Oldervoll, Christina Hilmarsen, Ellen M I Ersfjord

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ingrid S FøllingCentre for Obesity Research, Department of Surgery, Forsyningssenteret, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, 7006, Norway. ingfoll@gmail.com.
Line M OldervollDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 7491, Norway.
Christina HilmarsenDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 7491, Norway.
Ellen M I ErsfjordCentre for Obesity Research, Department of Surgery, Forsyningssenteret, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, 7006, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is a major health concern in western countries. In Norway, patients with obesity can attend weight-loss programmes, which focus on changes in dietary and physical activity habits. Use of self-monitoring is advocated when changing dietary and physical activity habits for adults with obesity. This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients with obesity who used activity monitors while attending a weight-loss programme.

methodsPatients with body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m

resultsOf the 29 informants (aged 21 to 66 years) interviewed, 59% were female. Their experience with activity monitors was related to their adherence to the weight-loss programme. Two main themes emerged from the informants stories: 1. "Activity monitors visualize proof of effort or failure to change health habits". 2. "Activity monitors act as a positive or negative enforcer when incorporating change".

conclusionsUsing activity monitors either strengthens or undermines patients' attempts to change health habits when attending a weight-loss program. Our findings suggest a need for more individualized weight-loss programmes for patients with obesity.

Indexed as

Activity monitorsHealth habitsObesityQualitative researchWeight-loss programme

Identifiers

PMID33731190
PMCPMC7968213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.