ArticleBMC health services research2021
Adopt, adapt, or abandon technology-supported person-centred care initiatives: healthcare providers' beliefs matter.
Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital interaction in practice (DIP) between patient, general practitioner and home care services. Evaluation of a pilot study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Person-Centered Technology for Older Adults: Benefits, Limitations, and Considerations in Design and Use.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026Article
- Implementing a Commercial AI Fracture Detection Tool in Health Care Using the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability Framework: A Formative Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Exploring the Influence of Digitalization on Multidisciplinary Poststroke Rehabilitation Practice: Qualitative Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- "Living with heart failure" -patients' and nurses' experience using an online support program via a national e-health platform - a feasibility study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Participatory Rapid Appraisal and Focus Groups to co-design technology-supported integrated care.PloS one · 2026Article
- Sociotechnical influences on the adoption and use of AI-enabled clinical decision support systems in ophthalmology: a theory-based interview study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Organizing Telemonitoring-Decision-Making Between Centralized and Distributed Models in the Netherlands, Using the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework: Case Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- The search for successful welfare technology (WFT) implementation: Norwegian municipalities implementing a WFT coordinating role-a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Research on the impact of hospital organizational behavior on physicians'patient-centered care.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Person-centred care in oncological home services: a scoping review of patients' and caregivers' experience and needs.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Integrating information and communication technology into nursing practice for resilience: A cross-sectional quantitative study.PloS one · 2025Article
- A Nonrandomized Pilot Study to Investigate the Acceptability and Feasibility of LivR Well: A Multifaceted 28-Day Home-Based Liver Optimization Program for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.Gastro hep advances · 2025Article
- Examining attitudes to uptake and sustainment of technology among care aides in the delivery of care: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Hospital Staff Perspectives on the Drivers and Challenges in Implementing a Virtual Rehabilitation Ward: Qualitative Study.JMIR aging · 2024Article
- Article
- Generative AI in healthcare: an implementation science informed translational path on application, integration and governance.Implementation science : IS · 2024Review
- The Perspective of Nurses and Healthcare Providers on the use of Television Videos with People with Moderate to Severe Dementia.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2024Article
- Considering and understanding developmental and deployment barriers for wearable technologies in neurosciences.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTechnology support and person-centred care are the new mantra for healthcare programmes in Western societies. While few argue with the overarching philosophy of person-centred care or the potential of information technologies, there is less agreement on how to make them a reality in everyday clinical practice. In this paper, we investigate how individual healthcare providers at four innovation arenas in Scandinavia experienced the implementation of technology-supported person-centred care for people with long-term care needs by using the new analytical framework nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) of health and care technologies. We also discuss the usability and sensitivity of the NASSS framework for those seeking to plan, implement, and evaluate technology-supported healthcare programmes. This study is part of an interdisciplinary research and development project called Patients and Professionals in Partnership (2016-2020). It originates at one of ten work packages in this project.
methodThe main data consist of ethnographic field observations at the four innovation arenas and 29 interviews with involved healthcare providers. To ensure continuous updates and status on work in the four innovation arenas, we have also participated in a total of six annual network meetings arranged by the project.
resultsWhile the NASSS framework is very useful for identifying and communicating challenges with the adoption and spread of technology-supported person-centred care initiatives, we found it less sensitive towards capturing the dedication, enthusiasm, and passion for care transformation that we found among the healthcare providers in our study. When it comes to technology-supported person-centred care, the point of no return has passed for the involved healthcare providers. To them, it is already a definite part of the future of healthcare services. How to overcome barriers and obstacles is pragmatically approached.
conclusionIncreased knowledge about healthcare providers and their visions as potential assets for care transformation might be critical for those seeking to plan, implement, and evaluate technology-supported healthcare programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.