Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33731073›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Determinants of influenza vaccine uptake and willingness to be vaccinated by pharmacists among the active adult population in Hungary: a cross-sectional exploratory study.

Githa Fungie Galistiani, Mária Matuz, Nikolett Matuszka, Péter Doró, Krisztina Schváb, Zsófia Engi, Ria Benkő

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Githa Fungie GalistianiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szikra utca 8, Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
Mária MatuzDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szikra utca 8, Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
Nikolett MatuszkaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szikra utca 8, Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
Péter DoróDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szikra utca 8, Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
Krisztina SchvábDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szikra utca 8, Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
Zsófia EngiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szikra utca 8, Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
Ria BenkőDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szikra utca 8, Szeged, 6725, Hungary. benkoria@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8009-8962
University of Szeged · HU

Funding

University of Szeged Open Access Fund 4597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies have addressed influenza vaccine uptake in risk-group populations (e.g. the elderly). However, it is also necessary to assess influenza vaccine uptake in the active adult population, since they are considered to be a high-transmitter group. In several countries pharmacists are involved in adult vaccination in order to increase uptake. This study therefore aimed to investigate the determinants of influenza vaccination uptake and examine the willingness to be vaccinated by pharmacists.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among Hungarian adults using a self-administered online questionnaire distributed via social media (Facebook). The questionnaire included five domains: demographics, vaccine uptake, factors that motivated or discouraged vaccination, knowledge and willingness of participants to accept pharmacists as influenza vaccine administrators. Descriptive statistics were applied and logistic regression was conducted to assess the possible determinants of vaccination uptake.

resultsData from 1631 participants who completed the questionnaires were analysed. Almost 58% of respondents (944/1631) had occupational and/or health risk factors for influenza. Just over one-tenth (12.3%;200/1631) of participants were vaccinated during the 2017/18 influenza season, 15.4% (145/944) of whom had a risk factor for influenza. Approximately half of the participants (47.4%) believed that influenza vaccination can cause flu, and just over half of them (51.6%), were not knowledgeable about the safety of influenza vaccine ingredients. Logistic regression found that age, sex, health risk factor and knowledge on influenza/influenza vaccination were associated with influenza vaccination uptake (p < 0.05). The most frequently cited reason for having an influenza vaccination was self-protection (95.0%). The most common reason given for refusing the influenza vaccine was that the respondent stated they rarely had an infectious disease (67.7%). The number of participants who were willing to be vaccinated by pharmacists was two-times higher than the number of participants who were actually vaccinated during the 2017/18 influenza season.

conclusionInfluenza vaccine uptake in the active adult population is low in Hungary. Public awareness and knowledge about influenza vaccination and influenza disease should be increased. The results also suggest a need to extend the role played by pharmacists in Hungary.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHungaryPharmacistsSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesAdultDeterminantsInfluenza vaccinePharmacistsVaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID33731073
PMCPMC7967972
OpenAlexW3139507917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.