ArticleJournal of bone metabolism2021
Physical Activity and Bone Health in Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Journal of bone metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effects of exercise interventions on bone mineral density in middle-aged and older men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of exercise on bone mineral density in middle-aged and older men: A comprehensive meta-analysis.Archives of osteoporosis · 2023Pooled it
- Predictors of osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- The Effects of Exercise on Bone Mineral Density in Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.Calcified tissue international · 2022Pooled it
- The status quo of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals in Korea: a study focused on protocol registration and GRADE use.Epidemiology and health · 2022Pooled it
- Exercise Effects on Bone Mineral Density in Men.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of Exercise Training on Bone Health Parameters in Individuals With Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Pooled it
- Approach to personalizing the treatment of osteoporosis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- A microbiome-dependent gut-bone axis determines skeletal benefits from mechanical loading.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2024Article
- Physical Activity and Oxidative Stress in Aging.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Exercise and Musculoskeletal Health in Men With Low Bone Mineral Density: A Systematic Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2024Review
- Exercise to Prevent and Manage Frailty and Fragility Fractures.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023Review
- Adipopenia is associated with osteoporosis in community-dwelling non-underweight adults independent of sarcopenia.Archives of osteoporosis · 2023Article
- Global trends and hotspots in research on osteoporosis rehabilitation: A bibliometric study and visualization analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearch on osteoporosis and physical activity often focuses on women. We aimed to conduct a systematic review to assess the benefits and harms of physical activity interventions for men's bone health.
methodsWe used standard methods and searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (duration, ≥6 months) published in all languages across multiple databases and trial registries. The last search was conducted on July 22, 2020.
resultsWe included 11 studies (14 publications), resulting in a sample of N=723 men (range, 17-132 participants). We found low-certainty evidence that physical activity has little influence on the areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the total hip (5 RCTs, N=324; mean difference [MD], 0.03 [95 confidence interval (CI), 0.01 to 0.05]) and little or no influence on the aBMD at the femoral neck (3 RCTs, N=186; MD, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.04 to 0.04]), lumbar spine (3 RCTs; N=213; MD, 0.05 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.11]), and whole body (4 RCTs, N=203; MD, -0.00 [95% CI, -0.03 to 0.02]).
conclusionsWe found low-certainty evidence that physical activity (≥6 months) has some effect on the total hip in men, but new evidence may change this finding. This review highlights the gap in the evidence on specific intervention prescriptions that can benefit the bone geometry, structure, microarchitecture, and, ultimately, bone strength in men. Future research should engage in comprehensive reporting of harms, quality of life outcomes, advanced imaging findings, and long-term interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.