ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021
Prior-image-based CT reconstruction using attenuation-mismatched priors.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a nomogram based on three-dimensional quantitative parameters from dual-layer detector spectral computed tomography for predicting treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- A low-dose CT reconstruction method using sub-pixel anisotropic diffusion.Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
- Pie-Net: Prior-information-enabled deep learning noise reduction for coronary CT angiography acquired with a photon counting detector CT.Medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prior-image-based reconstruction (PIBR) methods are powerful tools for reducing radiation doses and improving the image quality of low-dose computed tomography (CT). Apart from anatomical changes, prior and current images can also have different attenuations because they originated from different scanners or from the same scanner but with different x-ray beam qualities (e.g., kVp settings, beam filters) during data acquisition. In such scenarios, with attenuation-mismatched priors, PIBR is challenging. In this work, we investigate a specific PIBR method, called statistical image reconstruction, using normal-dose image-induced nonlocal means regularization (SIR-ndiNLM), to address PIBR with such attenuation-mismatched priors and achieve quantitative low-dose CT imaging. We propose two corrective schemes for the original SIR-ndiNLM method, (1) a global histogram-matching approach and (2) a local attenuation correction approach, to account for the attenuation differences between the prior and current images in PIBR. We validate the efficacy of the proposed schemes using images acquired from dual-energy CT scanners to simulate attenuation mismatches. Meanwhile, we utilize different CT slices to simulate anatomical mismatches or changes between the prior and the current low-dose image. We observe that the original SIR-ndiNLM introduces artifacts to the reconstruction when an attenuation-mismatched prior is used. Furthermore, we find that a larger attenuation mismatch between the prior and current images results in more severe artifacts in the SIR-ndiNLM reconstruction. Our two proposed corrective schemes enable SIR-ndiNLM to effectively handle the attenuation mismatch and anatomical changes between the two images and successfully eliminate the artifacts. We demonstrate that the proposed techniques permit SIR-ndiNLM to leverage the attenuation-mismatched prior and achieve quantitative low-dose CT reconstruction from both low-flux and sparse-view data acquisitions. This work permits robust and reliable PIBR for CT data acquired using different beam settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.