Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33729703›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing knowledge2022

NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC linkages to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): Part 3. Family response.

Cheryl Marie Wagner, Elizabeth A Swanson, Sue Moorhead, Vanessa Monteiro Mantovani, Karen Dunn-Lopez, Tamara G R Macieira, Noriko Abe, Susie Breitenstein

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing knowledge, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cheryl Marie WagnerCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3767-4239
Elizabeth A SwansonCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6681-6294
Sue MoorheadCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-9909
Vanessa Monteiro MantovaniSchool of Nursing, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2684-2746
Karen Dunn-LopezCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9700-941X
Tamara G R MacieiraCollege of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1100-3760
Noriko AbeCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-6619
Susie BreitensteinCollege of Nursing, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
University of Iowa · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide guidance to nurses caring for families with COVID-19, we developed linkages using interoperable standardized nursing terminologies: NANDA International (NANDA-I) nursing diagnoses, Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). In addition, we wanted to identify gaps in the terminologies and potential new nursing diagnoses, outcomes, and interventions for future development related to nurse roles in family care during a pandemic.

methodsUsing a consensus process, seven nurse experts created the linkages focused on families during the COVID-19 pandemic using the following steps: (1) creating an initial list of potential nursing diagnoses, (2) selecting and categorizing outcomes that aligned with all components of each nursing diagnosis selected, and (3) identifying relevant nursing interventions.

findingsWe identified a total of seven NANDA-I nursing diagnoses as the basis for the linkage work. These are distributed in three NANDA-I Domains and based in the psychosocial dimension of the Nursing Care in Response to Pandemics model. Eighty-nine different NOC outcomes were identified to guide care based on the nursing diagnoses, and 54 different NIC interventions were suggested as possible interventions. Fifteen new proposed concepts were identified for future development across the three classifications.

conclusionsThe linkages of nursing diagnoses, outcomes, and interventions provide a guide to enhance nursing practice and care documentation that could quantify the impact of nursing care to patient outcomes for families at risk for or infected by COVID-19. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: NANDA-I, NOC, and NIC linkages identified in this paper provide resources to support clinical decisions and guide critical thinking for nurses encountering care needs of families with COVID-19. Documentation of these linkages provides data that can create new knowledge to enhance the care of families impacted by COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Standardized Nursing TerminologyHumansNursing DiagnosisPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 pandemicfamily and caregiver needsNANDA-INICNOC linkages

Identifiers

PMID33729703
PMCPMC8250918
OpenAlexW3033706692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.