Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33729701›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2021

Do radiation therapists feel able to routinely screen for symptoms and distress in people with cancer: barriers impacting practice.

Belinda L Arnold, Georgia Halkett, Haryana Dhillon, Afaf Girgis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Survey of radiation therapists' current practices and perceptions of psychosocial and supportive care in Canada and Norway.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Belinda L ArnoldWollongong Hospital, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-3808
Georgia HalkettCurtin School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4065-4044
Haryana DhillonCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4039-5169
Afaf GirgisCentre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4101-4006
Curtin University · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUWollongong Hospital · AU

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program ScholarshipCancer Council of WA Research Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to evaluate radiation therapists' (RTs) perceptions regarding the perceived barriers, knowledge, attitudes, confidence and role in administering an electronic screening tool to routinely screen for cancer patients' symptoms and distress.

methodsRTs at two radiation therapy departments completed a cross-sectional paper/pen survey to assess their demographic and workplace characteristics, perceptions of barriers, knowledge, attitudes, confidence and opinion of their role in symptom and distress screening. Responses were evaluated using simple frequencies and free-text responses using thematic analysis.

resultsOf 39 RTs approached, 37 (95%) participated. The majority had not previously attended any emotional cues (77%) or psychosocial training (86%); 68% reported confidence discussing psychosocial concerns and recognising signs of anxiety and depression in patients, and 65% felt discussing patients' psychosocial concerns was part of their role. Administering the tool to patients was agreed to be the role of RTs by 38% of participants. Lack of education about psychosocial issues was the highest-ranked barrier to delivering the patient screening tool, with 74% of RTs responding 'it has made it difficult'.

conclusionWhilst RTs are willing to play a role in patients' psychosocial support, they do not feel able to fulfil this role adequately because they lacked knowledge and confidence to administer symptom and distress screening. This research has highlighted the need for RT education on psychosocial concerns and recognising and responding to emotional cues. Understanding the impact education may have on the knowledge, attitude, confidence and role of RTs performing routine symptom and distress screening is required.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareNeoplasmsAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychosocial Support SystemsAttitudeeducationemotional cuespsychosocial supportradiation therapistrole

Identifiers

PMID33729701
PMCPMC8168062
OpenAlexW3138459859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.