ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2021
Performance of ivisen IA-1400, a new point-of-care device with an internal centrifuge system, for the measurement of cardiac troponin I levels.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microsampling tools for collecting, processing, and storing blood at the point-of-care.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe present the analytical performance of the ivisen IA-1400, a new point-of-care device that features a characteristic built-in centrifuge system, to measure blood cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels.
methodsWhole blood and plasma samples obtained from patients who visited Korea University Guro Hospital were used to analyze measurement range, cross-reactivity, interference, and sensitivity and specificity. We performed a correlation analysis of the ivisen IA-1400 versus the Access AccuTnI+3 immunoassay using the UniCel™ DxI 800 platform and the PATHFAST™ hs-cTnI assay.
resultsWithin-run precisions were classified as low, 9.8%; middle, 10.2%; and high, 8.5%. The limit of blank was 3.1 ng/L for plasma samples and 4.3 ng/L for whole blood samples. The limit of detection was 8.4 ng/L for plasma samples and 10.0 ng/L for whole blood samples, respectively. The limit of quantitation at a coefficient of variation of 20% and 10% was 19.5 ng/L and 45.5 ng/L for plasma samples, respectively. The comparative evaluation between the two other assays and ivisen IA-1400 showed excellent correlation, with Spearman's correlation coefficients (R) of 0.992 and 0.985. The sensitivity and specificity of ivisen IA-1400 using the optimum cut-off value of 235 ug/L were 94.6% and 98.2%, respectively.
conclusionThe ivisen IA-1400 showed acceptable and promising performance in cTnI measurements using whole blood and plasma samples, with limited information in the clinical performance. The flexibility for sample selection using the internal centrifugation system is the main advantage of this point-of-care device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.