SynthesisInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2021
Learning from safety incidents in high-reliability organizations: a systematic review of learning tools that could be adapted and used in healthcare.
Synthesis in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient safety incident reporting systems and reporting practices in African healthcare organisations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open quality · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review of types of safety incidents and the processes and systems used for safety incident reporting in care homes.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Pooled it
- Implementing after action review in an Irish tertiary hospital: a mixed-methods evaluation of safety culture and second victim experience and support.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Reducing human error in global healthcare: leadership, learning, and system resilience.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Use of Safety Stand-Down Initiatives to Reduce Hospital Harm Events.Ochsner journal · 2026Article
- Beyond Reporting: A Qualitative Approach to Managing Ethical Incidents in Healthcare.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- A Simple Solution for a Complex Problem: The "Sterile Cockpit" to Improve Ward Rounds.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Mechanism of career resilience formation during the role transition of medical interns: a grounded theory study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- What digital health technology types are used in mental health prevention and intervention? Review of systematic reviews for systematization of technologies.Journal of occupational health · 2024Review
- Article
- Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023Article
- The role of teamwork and non-technical skills for improving emergency surgical outcomes: an international perspective.Patient safety in surgery · 2022Review
- Form for planning and elaborating high fidelity simulation scenarios: A validation study.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA high-reliability organization (HRO) is an organization that has sustained almost error-free performance, despite operating in hazardous conditions where the consequences of errors could be catastrophic. A number of tools and initiatives have been used within HROs to learn from safety incidents, some of which have the potential to be adapted and used in healthcare. We conducted a systematic review to identify any learning tools deemed to be effective that could be adapted and used by multidisciplinary teams in healthcare following a patient safety incident.
methodsThis review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses for Protocols reporting guidelines and was registered with the PROSPERO (CRD42017071528). A search of databases was carried out in January 2021, from the date of their commencement. We conducted a search on electronic databases such as Web of Science, Science Direct, MEDLINE in Process Jan 1950-present, EMBASE Jan 1974-present, CINAHL 1982-present, PsycINFO 1967-present, Scopus and Google Scholar. We also searched the grey literature including reports from government agencies, relevant doctoral dissertations and conference proceedings. A customized data extraction form was used to capture pertinent information from included studies and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool to appraise on their quality.
resultsA total of 5921 articles were identified, with 964 duplicate articles removed and 4932 excluded at the title (4055), abstract (510) and full-text (367) stages. Twenty-five articles were included in the review. Learning tools identified included debriefing, simulation, crew resource management and reporting systems to disseminate safety messages. Debriefing involved deconstructing incidents using reflective questions, whilst simulation training involved asking staff to relive the event again by performing the task(s) in a role-play scenario. Crew resource management is a set of training procedures that focus on communication, leadership and decision-making. Sophisticated incident-reporting systems provide valuable information on hazards and were widely recommended as a way of disseminating key safety messages following safety incidents. These learning tools were found to have a positive impact on learning if conducted soon after the incident with efficient facilitation.
conclusionHealthcare organizations should find ways to adapt to the learning tools or initiatives used in HROs following safety incidents. It is challenging to recommend any specific one as all learning tools have shown considerable promise. However, the way these tools or initiatives are implemented is critical, and so further work is needed to explore how to successfully embed them into healthcare organizations so that everyone at every level of the organization embraces them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.