Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33729164›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Developing a Web-Based Shared Decision-Making Tool for Fertility Preservation Among Reproductive-Age Women With Breast Cancer: An Action Research Approach.

Ling-Ming Tseng, Pei-Ju Lien, Chen-Yu Huang, Yi-Fang Tsai, Ta-Chung Chao, Sheng-Miauh Huang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04602910 (Developing a Web-based Shared Decision-making Tool for Fertility Preservation Among Reproductive-age Women With Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04602910 nacompletednot on this map

Developing a Web-based Shared Decision-making Tool for Fertility Preservation Among Reproductive-age Women With Breast Cancer: An Action Research Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorMackay Medical CollegeRan2014 to 2020Enrolled25ConditionsBreast Neoplasm FemaleArmsa web-based shared decision-making tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Delphi Study to Identify Priority Indicators for Formulary Selection of Innovative Anticancer Drugs in China.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Psychological and reproductive decision-making experiences of young women after breast cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ling-Ming TsengComprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4648-6646
Pei-Ju LienComprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4644-1533
Chen-Yu HuangDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3527-2789
Yi-Fang TsaiComprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7665-0462
Ta-Chung ChaoComprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1451-1939
Sheng-Miauh Huang *MacKay Medical College, Department of Nursing, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3715-0147
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TWMackay Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pregnancy rate after cancer treatment for female survivors is lower than that of the general population. Future infertility is a significant concern for patients with breast cancer and is associated with a poor quality of life. Reproductive-age patients with breast cancer have safe options when choosing a type of fertility preservation method to be applied. Better information and support resources aimed at women to support their decision making are needed.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to develop a web-based shared decision-making tool for helping patients with breast cancer make decisions on fertility preservation.

methodsWe used the action research cycle of observing, reflecting, planning, and acting to develop a web-based shared decision-making tool. The following four phrases were applied: (1) observe and reflect-collect and analyze the decision-making experiences of patients and health care providers; (2) reflect and plan-apply the initial results to create a paper design and modify the content; (3) plan and act-brainstorm about the web pages and modify the content; (4) act and observe-evaluate the effectiveness and refine the website's shared decision-making tool. Interviews, group meetings, and constant dialogue were conducted between the various participants at each step. Effectiveness was evaluated using the Preparation for Decision-Making scale.

resultsFive major parts were developed with the use of the action research approach. The Introduction (part 1) describes the severity of cancer treatment and infertility. Options (part 2) provides the knowledge of fertility preservation. The shared decision-making tool was designed as a step-by-step process (part 3) that involves the comparison of options, patient values, and preferences; their knowledge regarding infertility and options; and reaching a collective decision. Resources (part 4) provides information on the hospitals that provide such services, and References (part 5) lists all the literature cited in the website. The results show the web-based shared decision-making meets both patients' and health providers' needs and helps reproductive-age patients with breast cancer make decisions about fertility preservation.

conclusionsWe have created the first web-based shared decision-making tool for making fertility preservation decisions in Taiwan. We believe female patients of reproductive age will find the tool useful and its use will become widespread, which should increase patient autonomy and improve communication about fertility preservation with clinicians.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT04602910; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04602910.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFertility PreservationDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansInternetPregnancyQuality of Lifeaction researchbreast cancerfertility preservationshared decision makingwebsite

Identifiers

PMID33729164
PMCPMC8074988
OpenAlexW3128799150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.