Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33729044›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Converting a Geriatrics Clinic to Virtual Visits during COVID-19: A Case Study.

Sowmya Iyer, Priyanka Mehta, Joanne Weith, Dat Hoang-Gia, Janet Moore, Chalise Carlson, Philip Choe, Erin Sakai, Christine Gould

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Editorial: Covid-19 and Virtual Geriatric Care.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2022
    Article
  13. Care for dementia patients and caregivers amid COVID-19 pandemic.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Editorial: Telehealth and Geriatrics.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sowmya IyerVA Palo Alto GRECC, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2829-5747
Priyanka MehtaVA Palo Alto GRECC, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Joanne WeithVA Palo Alto GRECC, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Dat Hoang-GiaVA Palo Alto GRECC, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Janet MooreVA Palo Alto GRECC, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Chalise CarlsonVA Palo Alto GRECC, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Philip ChoeVA Palo Alto GRECC, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Erin SakaiVA Palo Alto Health Care System Department of Mental Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Christine GouldVA Palo Alto GRECC, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo characterize the experience of converting a geriatrics clinic to telehealth visits in early stages of a pandemic.

designAn organizational case study with mixed methods evaluation from the first 8 weeks of converting a geriatrics clinic from in-person visits to video and telephone visits.

settingVeteran's Health Administration in Northern California Participants Community-dwelling older Veterans receiving care at VA Palo Alto Geriatrics clinic. Veterans had a mean age of 85.7 (SD = 6.8) and 72.1% had cognitive impairment.

interventionVeterans with face-to-face appointments were converted to video or telephone visits to mitigate exposure to community spread of COVID-19. MEASUREMENTS: Thirty-two patient evaluations and 80 clinician feedback evaluations were completed. This provided information on satisfaction, care access during pandemic, and travel and time savings.

resultsOf the 62 scheduled appointments, 43 virtual visits (69.4%) were conducted. Twenty-six (60.5%) visits were conducted via video, 17 (39.5%) by telephone. Virtual visits saved patients an average of 118.6 minutes each. Patients and providers had similar, positive perceptions about telehealth to in-person visit comparison, limiting exposure, and visit satisfaction. After the telehealth appointment, patients indicated greater comfort with using virtual visits in the future. Thirty-one evaluations included comments for qualitative analysis. We identified 3 main themes of technology set-up and usability, satisfaction with visit, and clinical assessment and communication.

conclusionDuring a pandemic that has limited the ability to safely conduct inperson services, virtual formats offer a feasible and acceptable alternative for clinically-complex older patients. Despite potential barriers and additional effort required for telehealth visits, patients expressed willingness to utilize this format. Patients and providers reported high satisfaction, particularly with the ability to access care similar to in-person while staying safe. Investing in telehealth services during a pandemic ensures that vulnerable older patients can access care while maintaining social distancing, an important safety measure.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCaliforniaCOVID-19DementiaGeriatricsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle AgedOrganizational Case StudiesPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchTelemedicineTelephoneaccess to caredementiageriatricsprimary caretelehealthVeteransvideo visit

Identifiers

PMID33729044
PMCPMC7975524
OpenAlexW3137780788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.