Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33728682›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2021

Scaling up private land conservation to meet recovery goals for grassland birds.

David C Pavlacky, Christian A Hagen, Anne M Bartuszevige, Rich Iovanna, Thomas Luke George, David E Naugle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Limited capacity of habitat features to buffer grassland bird declines.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Scaling up private land conservation to meet recovery goals for grassland birds.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David C PavlackyBird Conservancy of the Rockies, Brighton, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8457-8023
Christian A HagenDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Anne M BartuszevigePlaya Lakes Joint Venture, Lafayette, Colorado, USA.
Rich IovannaEconomic and Policy Analysis, Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.
Thomas Luke GeorgeBird Conservancy of the Rockies, Brighton, Colorado, USA.
David E NaugleW.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.

Funding

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) 39676USDA, Farm Service Agency (FSA) AG-3151P-15-0039U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) 68-3A75-14-120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term population declines have elevated recovery of grassland avifauna to among the highest conservation priorities in North America. Because most of the Great Plains is privately owned, recovery of grassland bird populations depends on voluntary conservation with strong partnerships between private landowners and resource professionals. Despite large areas enrolled in voluntary practices through U.S. Department of Agriculture's Lesser Prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) Initiative (LPCI), the effectiveness of Farm Bill investments for meeting wildlife conservation goals remains an open question. Our objectives were to evaluate extents to which Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and LPCI-grazing practices influence population densities of grassland birds; estimate relative contributions of practices to regional bird populations; and evaluate percentages of populations conserved relative to vulnerability of species. We designed a large-scale impact-reference study and used the Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions program to evaluate bird population targets of the Playa Lakes Joint Venture. We used point transect distance sampling to estimate density and population size for 35 species of grassland birds on private lands enrolled in native or introduced CRP plantings and LPCI-prescribed grazing. Treatment effects indicated CRP plantings increased densities of three grassland obligates vulnerable to habitat loss, and LPCI grazing increased densities of four species requiring heterogeneity in dense, tall-grass structure (α = 0.1). Population estimates in 2016 indicated the practices conserved breeding habitat for 4.5 million birds (90% CI: 4.0-5.1), and increased population sizes of 16 species , totaling 1.8 million birds (CI: 1.4-2.4). Conservation practices on private land benefited the most vulnerable grassland obligate species (AIC

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGrasslandAnimalsBirdsGoalsPlant BreedingConservation Reserve Programdensidad poblacionalIniciativa de la Gallina de Pradera MenorIntegrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation RegionsLesser Prairie-chicken InitiativeMonitoreo Integrado en las Regiones de Conservación de Avespopulation densitypopulation sizePrograma de Reservas de ConservaciónProyecto de Ley de Granjas Estadunidensetamaño poblacionalU.S. Farm Bill

Identifiers

PMID33728682
PMCPMC8518544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.