Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33728596›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2021

Impact of peri-implant bone resorption, prosthetic materials, and crown to implant ratio on the stress distribution of short implants: a finite element analysis.

Pinar Ercal, Aysegul Erten Taysi, Demet Cagil Ayvalioglu, Meltem Mert Eren, Soner Sismanoglu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical efficacy of extra-short implant (4 mm) placed in posterior areas: a Meta-analysis.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Can an increase in abutment screw length enable biomechanical advantages for implants with increased crown height space?Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pinar ErcalDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Altinbas University, Incirli cd. No:11, 34147, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey. pinar.ercal@altinbas.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0763-3930
Aysegul Erten TaysiDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Altinbas University, Incirli cd. No:11, 34147, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Demet Cagil AyvaliogluDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Altinbas University, Incirli cd. No:11, 34147, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Meltem Mert ErenDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Altinbas University, Incirli cd. No:11, 34147, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Soner SismanogluDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Altinbas University, Incirli cd. No:11, 34147, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Altınbaş University · TR

Funding

Altinbas University PB2017/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of prosthetic materials and crown/implant (C/I) ratio on short implants with a marginal bone resorption. Three-dimensional finite element analysis was used to simulate stress distribution under static loading in non-resorption and resorption scenarios (3-mm vertical bone loss) in implants restored with single crowns and C/I ratios of 1:1, 1.5:1, and 2:1 were evaluated. Different crown materials were used: porcelain-fused to metal, porcelain-fused to zirconia, monolithic zirconia, and zirconia-based crown veneered with indirect composite resin. The C/I ratio, the peri-implant bone resorption, and the loading conditions were the key factors affecting the generated stress in short implants. In non-resorption models, von Mises stress ranged between 50 and 105 MPa whereas in resorption models, the values ranged from 168 to 322 MPa, both increasing with the higher C/I ratio under oblique forces. Under axial loading, the C/I ratio did not influence the stress values as the presence of resorption was the only parameter increasing, 57 MPa for the non-resorption models and 101 MPa for the resorption models, respectively. Preference of a prosthetic material was ineffective on the distribution of stress in the bone and implant structure under static loading in any models. The peri-implant bone resorption and a higher C/I ratio in short implants increase the stress values under both axial and oblique forces, whereas the crown material does not influence stress distribution in the surrounding bone and implant structure.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionDental ImplantsComposite ResinsCrownsDental Stress AnalysisFinite Element AnalysisHumansStress, MechanicalComposite ResinsDental ImplantsBone resorptionCrown restorationDental implantsFinite element analysisImplant prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID33728596
OpenAlexW3139053980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.