Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33728557›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2021

Does the Psychiatrist's Use of Subjective Well-Being Measurement in People with Schizophrenia Provide a Better Alignment with the Patient's Well-Being Perception than Clinical Judgement Alone?

Warut Aunjitsakul, Teerapat Teetharatkul, Arnont Vitayanont, Tippawan Liabsuetrakul

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functioning and Happiness in People with Schizophrenia: Analyzing the Role of Cognitive Impairment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Warut AunjitsakulDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand. awarut@medicine.psu.ac.th.ORCID 0000-0001-8774-3592
Teerapat TeetharatkulDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Arnont VitayanontDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Tippawan LiabsuetrakulEpidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Prince of Songkla University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine the agreement between patient and psychiatrist ratings of subjective well-being in people with schizophrenia using three well-being measurements: Satisfaction with Life, Subjective Happiness, and Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic Treatment (SWN), including the SWN-subscale, and to investigate whether the psychiatrist's judgement or the psychiatrist-rated SWN is better at defining patient well-being. Patients with schizophrenia (n = 150) completed the three well-being measurements, then met psychiatrists, and their well-being was judged as either 'poor' or 'adequate' via the usual clinical assessment before being assessed again by the psychiatrist using the same measurements. Intra-class correlation was used to analyze the absolute agreement between 'patient-rated' and 'psychiatrist-rated' scores. Agreements on 'adequate' well-being status between patient-rated SWN (≥ 80; gold standard), psychiatrist-rated SWN, and psychiatrist's judgement were calculated using Kappa coefficients. We also calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the psychiatrist's judgement and the psychiatrist-rated SWN to define adequate well-being. SWN showed the strongest absolute agreement between patient-psychiatrist ratings (ICC = 0.7, p = 0.005), with physical functioning yielding the highest and self-control the lowest coefficients. The psychiatrist-rated SWN showed a better Kappa coefficient (0.4, p < 0.001) than the psychiatrist's judgement. Clinical judgement showed a 67% sensitivity and a 64% specificity, whereas the psychiatrist-rated SWN (score 93, AUC 81.4%) showed a 74% sensitivity and a 74% specificity for well-being prediction. The use of SWN by psychiatrists yielded a better alignment of well-being than the psychiatrist's judgement alone. The SWN subscale could help fill the gap between clinician and patient views on well-being. Psychiatrists should upskill in assessing patient wellbeing for appropriate treatment provision.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsPsychiatrySchizophreniaClinical ReasoningHumansPerceptionAntipsychotic AgentsAntipsychotic agentsJudgementPsychiatrySchizophreniaSelf-assessmentTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID33728557
OpenAlexW3139273020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.