Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33728528›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2022

Successful maintenance of process and outcomes for oesophageal cancer surgery in Ireland during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jarlath C Bolger, Noel E Donlon, Waqas Butt, Colm Neary, Mohammed Al Azzawi, Orla Brett, Sinead King, Eithne Downey, Mayilone Arumugasamy, Thomas Murphy and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A pragmatic dialogue amongst stakeholders on the impact of COVID-19 on Irish cancer patients and healthcare services and lessons learned.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jarlath C BolgerTrinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0796-633X
Noel E DonlonTrinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
Waqas ButtTrinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
Colm NearyMercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Mohammed Al AzzawiBeaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Orla BrettBeaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Sinead KingTrinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
Eithne DowneyBeaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Mayilone ArumugasamyBeaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Thomas MurphyMercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
William B RobbBeaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Chris G CollinsUniversity Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Paul A CarrollUniversity Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Claire L DonohoeTrinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
Narayanasamy RaviTrinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
John V ReynoldsTrinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland. reynoljv@tcd.ie.
St. James's Hospital · IEBeaumont Hospital · IEMercy University Hospital · IEUniversity Hospital Galway · IETrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe emergence of the novel coronavirus Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the coronavirus disease COVID-19 has impacted enormously on non-COVID-19-related hospital care. Curtailment of intensive care unit (ICU) access threatens complex surgery, particularly impacting on outcomes for time-sensitive cancer surgery. Oesophageal cancer surgery is a good example. This study explored the impact of the pandemic on process and short-term surgical outcomes, comparing the first wave of the pandemic from April to June in 2020 with the same period in 2019.

methodsData from all four Irish oesophageal cancer centres were reviewed. All patients undergoing resection for oesophageal malignancy from 1 April to 30 June inclusive in 2020 and 2019 were included. Patient, disease, and peri-operative outcomes (including COVID-19 infection) were compared.

resultsIn 2020, 45 patients underwent oesophagectomy, and 53 in the equivalent period in 2019. There were no differences in patient demographics, co-morbidities, or use of neoadjuvant therapy. The median time to surgery from neoadjuvant therapy was 8 weeks in both 2020 and 2019. There were no significant differences in operative interventions between the two time periods. There was no difference in operative morbidity in 2020 and 2019 (28% vs 40%, p = 0.28). There was no in-hospital mortality in either period. No patient contracted COVID-19 in the perioperative period.

conclusionsContinuing surgical resection for oesophageal cancer was feasible and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland. The national response to this threat was therefore successful by these criteria in the curative management of oesophageal cancer.

Indexed as

COVID-19Esophageal NeoplasmsHumansIrelandPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Oesophageal cancerOesophagectomy

Identifiers

PMID33728528
PMCPMC7963466
OpenAlexW3137951813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.