Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33728519›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2021

An Item Response Theory-Informed Strategy to Model Total Score Data from Composite Scales.

Gustaf J Wellhagen, Sebastian Ueckert, Maria C Kjellsson, Mats O Karlsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantitative Comparisons of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale Versions Using Item Response Theory.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gustaf J WellhagenPharmacometrics Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sebastian UeckertPharmacometrics Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden.
Maria C KjellssonPharmacometrics Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mats O KarlssonPharmacometrics Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden. mats.karlsson@farmaci.uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Composite scale data is widely used in many therapeutic areas and consists of several categorical questions/items that are usually summarized into a total score (TS). Such data is discrete and bounded by nature. The gold standard to analyse composite scale data is item response theory (IRT) models. However, IRT models require item-level data while sometimes only TS is available. This work investigates models for TS. When an IRT model exists, it can be used to derive the information as well as expected mean and variability of TS at any point, which can inform TS-analyses. We propose a new method: IRT-informed functions of expected values and standard deviation in TS-analyses. The most common models for TS-analyses are continuous variable (CV) models, while bounded integer (BI) models offer an alternative that respects scale boundaries and the nature of TS data. We investigate the method in CV and BI models on both simulated and real data. Both CV and BI models were improved in fit by IRT-informed disease progression, which allows modellers to precisely and accurately find the corresponding latent variable parameters, and IRT-informed SD, which allows deviations from homoscedasticity. The methodology provides a formal way to link IRT models and TS models, and to compare the relative information of different model types. Also, joint analyses of item-level data and TS data are made possible. Thus, IRT-informed functions can facilitate total score analysis and allow a quantitative analysis of relative merits of different analysis methods.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansParkinson DiseaseSeverity of Illness Indexbounded integer modelcomposite scale dataIRT-informed total score analysistotal score analysis

Identifiers

PMID33728519
PMCPMC7966126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.