Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33728505›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2021

Single-Centre Experience of Supra-Renal Vena Cava Resection and Reconstruction.

Nikola Vladov, Radoslav Kostadinov, Vassil Mihaylov, Ivelin Takorov, Tsonka Lukanova, Maria Yakova, Tsvetan Trichkov, Evelina Odisseeva, Ventsislav Mutafchiyski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikola VladovClinic of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Military Medical Academy, 3 Georgi Sofiiski Street, Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria.
Radoslav KostadinovClinic of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Military Medical Academy, 3 Georgi Sofiiski Street, Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria. radokost@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8581-4390
Vassil MihaylovClinic of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Military Medical Academy, 3 Georgi Sofiiski Street, Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria.
Ivelin TakorovFirst Clinic of Abdominal Surgery, Military Medical Academy, 3 Georgi Sofiiski Street, Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria.
Tsonka LukanovaFirst Clinic of Abdominal Surgery, Military Medical Academy, 3 Georgi Sofiiski Street, Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria.
Maria YakovaClinic of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Military Medical Academy, 3 Georgi Sofiiski Street, Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria.
Tsvetan TrichkovClinic of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Military Medical Academy, 3 Georgi Sofiiski Street, Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria.
Evelina OdisseevaClinic of Anaesthesiology, Reanimation and Intensive Treatment, Military Medical Academy, 3 Georgi Sofiiski Street, 1606, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Ventsislav MutafchiyskiClinic of Endoscopic, Endocrine Surgery and Coloproctology, Military Medical Academy, 3 Georgi Sofiiski Street, 1606, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Military Medical Academy · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumours involving the supra-renal segment of IVC have dismal prognosis if left untreated. Currently, aggressive surgical management is the only potentially curative treatment but is associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality. This study aims to evaluate perioperative factors, associated with adverse postoperative outcomes, based on the perioperative characteristics and type of IVC reconstruction.

methodsWe identified 44 consecutive patients, who underwent supra-renal IVC resection with a mean age of 57.3 years. Isolated resection of IVC was performed in four patients, concomitant liver resection was performed in 27 patients and other associated resection in 13 patients. Total vascular exclusion was applied in 21 patients, isolated IVC occlusion in 11 patients. Neither venovenous bypass (VVB) nor hypothermic perfusion was used in any of the cases.

resultsThe mean operative time was 205 min (150-324 min) and the mean estimated blood loss was 755 ml (230-4500 ml). Overall morbidity was 59% and major complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥ III) occurred in 11 patients (25%). The 90-day mortality was 11% (5pts). Intraoperative haemotransfusion was significantly associated with postoperative general complications (p < 0,001). With a mean follow-up of 26.2 months, the actuarial 1-, 3- and 5-year survival is 69%, 34%, and 16%, respectively.

conclusionsIVC resection and reconstruction in the aspect of aggressive surgical management of malignant disease confers a survival advantage in patients, often considered unresectable. When performed in experienced centres it is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationVena Cava, InferiorHepatectomyHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33728505
OpenAlexW3137183337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.