Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33728474›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021

[From neuromyelitis optica to neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: from clinical syndrome to diagnistic classification].

Orhan Aktas, Tania Kümpfel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Orhan AktasKlinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Tania KümpfelInstitut für klinische Neuroimmunologie, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. tania.kuempfel@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), derived from NMO or Devic's disease, is considered as a distinct disease since the discovery of a novel and pathogenic serum autoantibody targeting aquaporin‑4 (AQP4-IgG) and is distinguished from classical multiple sclerosis (MS). With the continuous extension of knowledge on the clinical manifestations, the previously narrow diagnostic term NMO became NMOSD, which has also been used in the diagnostic criteria since 2015. The current diagnostic criteria enable the early diagnosis of NMOSD in patients with and without AQP4-IgG. Typical clinical manifestations include involvement of the spinal cord, optic nerve and brainstem. Typically patients with the disease also present with neuropathic pain, painful tonic spasms and also other unusual manifestations in NMOSD. Especially in AQP4-IgG positive NMOSD patients, the coexistence with other autoimmune diseases is frequently observed. In most cases NMOSD follows a relapsing course with exacerbation-free periods sometimes lasting years and can be manifested first in advanced adulthood. A subset of AQP4-IgG negative NMOSD patients have been found to harbor autoantibodies targeting myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), which is considered as a distinct disease entity: these MOG antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD) can present with clinical syndromes resembling both NMOSD and MS and are currently the subject of intensive research.

Indexed as

Neuromyelitis OpticaAdultAquaporin 4AutoantibodiesHumansMyelin-Oligodendrocyte GlycoproteinSyndromeAquaporin 4AutoantibodiesMyelin-Oligodendrocyte GlycoproteinAquaporin‑4 antibodyClinical manifestationsDevic’s diseaseDiagnostic criteriaDisease course

Identifiers

PMID33728474
OpenAlexW3137387120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.