ArticleAPL bioengineering2021
Injectable, macroporous scaffolds for delivery of therapeutic genes to the injured spinal cord.
Article in APL bioengineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clickable Granular Hydrogel Scaffolds for Delivery of Neural Progenitor Cells to Sites of Spinal Cord Injury.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Impact of Annealing Chemistry on the Properties and Performance of Microporous Annealed Particle Hydrogels.Biomacromolecules · 2024Article
- Molecular weight of hyaluronic acid crosslinked into biomaterial scaffolds affects angiogenic potential.Acta biomaterialia · 2023Article
- Biocompatible Macroion/Growth Factor Assemblies for Medical Applications.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Current Concepts of Biomaterial Scaffolds and Regenerative Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Biomaterial-targeted precision nanoparticle delivery to the injured spinal cord.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Article
- Engineering Tissues of the Central Nervous System: Interfacing Conductive Biomaterials with Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Review
- CNS Organoid Surpasses Cell-Laden Microgel Assembly to Promote Spinal Cord Injury Repair.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Possibilities in bioelectronics: Super humans or science fiction?APL bioengineering · 2021Article
- Review
- Sustained delivery of neurotrophic factors to treat spinal cord injury.Translational neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomaterials are being developed as therapeutics for spinal cord injury (SCI) that can stabilize and bridge acute lesions and mediate the delivery of transgenes, providing a localized and sustained reservoir of regenerative factors. For clinical use, direct injection of biomaterial scaffolds is preferred to enable conformation to unique lesions and minimize tissue damage. While an interconnected network of cell-sized macropores is necessary for rapid host cell infiltration into-and thus integration of host tissue with-implanted scaffolds, injectable biomaterials have generally suffered from a lack of control over the macrostructure. As genetic vectors have short lifetimes
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.