ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2021
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm-diagnostic approach and post-surgical follow up: Three case reports and review of literature.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a nomogram for overall survival in pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: a population-based study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas with Delayed Ovarian Metastasis During Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Case Report: Primary solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the ovary with "cholesteroma-like" denaturation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Extra-pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: a case report of primary testis origin and review of the literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Spontaneous Heterotopic Autotransplantation of Splenic Tissue: A Mimic of Pancreatic Malignancy.ACG case reports journal · 2024Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas: Getting the Dosing of Surgery Right.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Potential Role for Observation in Small Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm (SPN).Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Case report: A case report and literature review of extrapancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSolid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare tumor that was first described by Frantz in 1959. Although this tumor is benign, some may have malignant potential that can be predicted based on demographics, imaging characteristics, and pathologic evaluation. This case series presents 3 SPN cases with discussion on gender differences, preoperative predictors of malignancy, and a suggested algorithm for diagnostic approach as well as post-surgical follow up. CASE SUMMARY: Three adult patients in a tertiary hospital found to have SPN, one elderly male and two young females. Each of the cases presented with abdominal pain and were discovered incidentally. Two cases underwent endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration and biopsy to assess tumor markers and immuno-histochemical staining (which were consistent with SPN before undergoing surgery), and one case underwent surgery directly after imaging. The average tumor size was 5 cm. Diagnosis was confirmed by histology. Two patients had post-surgical complications requiring intervention.
conclusionDemographic and imaging characteristics can be sufficient to establish diagnosis for SPN, while malignant cases require pre-operative evaluation with endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration/fine needle biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.