Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33727994›Full record

ReviewPharmacy practice

Principles of pharmacoeconomic analysis: the case of pharmacist-led interventions.

Fernanda S Tonin, Ignacio Aznar-Lou, Vasco M Pontinha, Roberto Pontarolo, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A Systematic Review of the Economic Burden of Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Drug-related problems and their predictors in pediatric community-acquired infections: the role of pharmacist-led interventions in Pakistan.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fernanda S ToninPharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Paraná . Curitiba ( Brazil ). stumpf.tonin@ufpr.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4262-8608
Ignacio Aznar-LouResearch and Development Unit, Sant Joan de Déu Research Institute . Barcelona, ( Spain ). i.aznar@pssjd.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6780-5968
Vasco M PontinhaDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, Center for Pharmacy Practice Innovation, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University . Richmond, VA ( United States ). vieiradasilvv@mymail.vcu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3333-1482
Roberto PontaroloDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Paraná . Curitiba ( Brazil ). pontarolo@ufpr.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7049-4363
Fernando Fernandez-LlimosCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto . Porto ( Portugal ). fllimos@ff.up.pt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8529-9595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past years, several factors such as evidence-based healthcare culture, quality-linked incentives, and patient-centered actions, associated with an important increase of financial constraints and pressures on healthcare budgets, resulted in a growing interest by policy-makers in enlarging pharmacists' roles in care. Numerous studies have demonstrated positive therapeutic outcomes associated with pharmaceutical services in a wide array of diseases. Yet, the evidence of the economic impact of the pharmacist in decreasing total health expenditures, unnecessary care, and societal costs relies on well-performed, reliable, and transparent economic evaluations, which are scarce. Pharmacoeconomics is a branch of health economics that usually focuses on balancing the costs and benefits of an intervention towards the use of limited resources, aiming at maximizing value to patients, healthcare payers and society through data driven decision making. These decisions can be guide by a health technology assessment (HTA) process that inform governmental players about medical, social, and economic implications of development, diffusion, and use of health technologies - including clinical pharmacy interventions. This paper aims to provide an overview of the important concepts in costing in healthcare, including studies classification according to the type of analysis method (e.g. budget-impact analysis, cost-minimization analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis), types of costs (e.g. direct, indirect and intangible costs) and outcomes (e.g. events prevented, quality adjusted life year - QALY, disability adjusted life year - DALY). Other key components of an economic evaluation such as the models' perspective, time horizon, modelling approaches (e.g. decision trees or simulation models as the Markov model) and sensitivity analysis are also briefly covered. Finally, we discuss the methodological issues for the identification, measurement and valuation of costs and benefits of pharmacy services, and suggest some recommendations for future studies, including the use of Value of Assessment Frameworks.

Indexed as

BiomedicalCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision MakingDecision TreesEconomicsHealth ExpendituresPharmaceuticalPharmaceutical ServicesQuality-Adjusted Life YearsTechnology AssessmentTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33727994
PMCPMC7939117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.