Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33727945›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Investigate the Effects of Kamishoyosan, a Traditional Japanese Medicine, on Menopausal Symptoms: The KOSMOS Study.

Kiyoshi Takamatsu, Mariko Ogawa, Satoshi Obayashi, Takashi Takeda, Masakazu Terauchi, Tsuyoshi Higuchi, Kiyoko Kato, Toshiro Kubota

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Kamishoyosan Alleviates Anxiety-like Behavior in a Premenstrual Syndrome Rat Model.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kiyoshi TakamatsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6944-3342
Mariko OgawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4086-7130
Satoshi ObayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Takashi TakedaDivision of Women's Health, Research Institute of Traditional Asian Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2428-1946
Masakazu TerauchiDepartment of Women's Health, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5577-0094
Tsuyoshi HiguchiDepartment of Nursing Science, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Aomori, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8350-6899
Kiyoko KatoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0047-7637
Toshiro KubotaDepartment of Gynecology, Tokyo Kyosai Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital · JPDokkyo Medical University · JPHirosaki University · JPKindai University · JPKure Kyosai Hospital · JPKyushu University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe KOSMOS study, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, investigated the effects and safety of kamishoyosan (TJ-24), a traditional Japanese medicine, in the treatment of climacteric disorder.

methodsJapanese women with climacteric disorder were administered a placebo during a 4-week run-in period, after which they were classified as placebo responders (R group) if their score on the modified Questionnaire for the Assessment of Climacteric Symptoms in Japanese Women (m-QACS) with excitability and irritability as the primary outcome improved by ≥ 3 points and as placebo nonresponders (NR group) otherwise. Members of the NR group were randomly allocated to receive either TJ-24 or placebo. After 12 weeks, their m-QACS scores, anxiety and depression, sleep, and overall quality of life (QOL) were compared.

resultsThe TJ-24 and placebo arms in the NR group included 20 patients each. The change in the m-QACS scores of members of the NR group for excitability and irritability at 12 weeks versus baseline was -3.1 ± 1.7 in the TJ-24 arm, a significant decrease, but compared with -2.7 ± 2.2 in the placebo arm, no significant difference was between two arms. However, the proportion of participants whose score improved by ≥3 points was significantly higher in the TJ-24 arm. In the subgroup analysis of premenopausal women, the changes in the score for excitability and irritability were significantly larger in the TJ-24 arm. The incidence of adverse drug reactions or adverse events did not differ between the two arms, and no serious events were reported.

conclusionAlthough no significant difference was identified for the primary outcome, a significantly higher proportion of patients who received TJ-24 displayed improvement. Its high level of safety and effects on excitability and irritability in premenopausal women suggest that TJ-24 may be a useful treatment.

Identifiers

PMID33727945
PMCPMC7935592
OpenAlexW3135230049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.