Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33727679›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Deep learning-based real-time detection of neurons in brain slices for in vitro physiology.

Mighten C Yip, Mercedes M Gonzalez, Christopher R Valenta, Matthew J M Rowan, Craig R Forest

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mighten C Yip *Georgia Institute of Technology, George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Atlanta, 30332, USA. mighteny@gatech.edu.
Mercedes M Gonzalez *Georgia Institute of Technology, George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Atlanta, 30332, USA.
Christopher R ValentaGeorgia Tech Research Institute, Atlanta, 30332, USA.
Matthew J M RowanDepartment of Cell Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, 30322, USA.
Craig R ForestGeorgia Institute of Technology, George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Atlanta, 30332, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USEmory University · USGeorgia Tech Research Institute

Funding

Novel Platforms for Systematic Optical Control of Complex Neural Circuits In VivoR01DA029639 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BOYDEN, EDWARD S. · 2010 to 2023
$6.7M
High-throughput robotic analysis of integrated neuronal phenotypesR01EY023173 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BOYDEN, EDWARD S., FOREST, CRAIG · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
Scalable Cell- and Circuit-Targeted ElectrophysiologyR01NS102727 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BOYDEN, EDWARD S., FOREST, CRAIG · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
In-vivo circuit activity measurement at single cell, sub-threshold resolutionU01MH106027 · NIMH · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FOREST, CRAIG, STANLEY, GARRETT B. · 2014 to 2016
$1.5M
Neuronal mechanisms of altered circuit excitability in early Alzheimer'sR56AG072473 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ROWAN, MATTHEW J.M. · 2021 to 2021
$385k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023173NIA NIH HHS R56 AG072473NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029639NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH106027NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common electrophysiology technique used in neuroscience is patch clamp: a method in which a glass pipette electrode facilitates single cell electrical recordings from neurons. Typically, patch clamp is done manually in which an electrophysiologist views a brain slice under a microscope, visually selects a neuron to patch, and moves the pipette into close proximity to the cell to break through and seal its membrane. While recent advances in the field of patch clamping have enabled partial automation, the task of detecting a healthy neuronal soma in acute brain tissue slices is still a critical step that is commonly done manually, often presenting challenges for novices in electrophysiology. To overcome this obstacle and progress towards full automation of patch clamp, we combined the differential interference microscopy optical technique with an object detection-based convolutional neural network (CNN) to detect healthy neurons in acute slice. Utilizing the YOLOv3 convolutional neural network architecture, we achieved a 98% reduction in training times to 18 min, compared to previously published attempts. We also compared networks trained on unaltered and enhanced images, achieving up to 77% and 72% mean average precision, respectively. This novel, deep learning-based method accomplishes automated neuronal detection in brain slice at 18 frames per second with a small data set of 1138 annotated neurons, rapid training time, and high precision. Lastly, we verified the health of the identified neurons with a patch clamp experiment where the average access resistance was 29.25 M[Formula: see text] (n = 9). The addition of this technology during live-cell imaging for patch clamp experiments can not only improve manual patch clamping by reducing the neuroscience expertise required to select healthy cells, but also help achieve full automation of patch clamping by nominating cells without human assistance.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicrodissectionAnimalsBrainMicroscopyNeurons

Identifiers

PMID33727679
PMCPMC7971045
OpenAlexW3138772245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.