Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33727584›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A facile colorimetric method for the quantification of labile iron pool and total iron in cells and tissue specimens.

Usama Abbasi, Srinivas Abbina, Arshdeep Gill, Vriti Bhagat, Jayachandran N Kizhakkedathu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Iron Metabolism with T2* Mapping Predicts an Enhanced Clinical Response to Pharmacologic Ascorbate in Patients with GBM.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  2. The structural basis of malodorant skatole formation by the glycyl radical enzyme indoleacetate decarboxylase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Usama Abbasi *Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Srinivas Abbina *Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arshdeep GillDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Vriti BhagatCentre for Blood Research, Life Sciences Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jayachandran N KizhakkedathuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. jay@pathology.ubc.ca.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification of iron is an important step to assess the iron burden in patients suffering from iron overload diseases, as well as tremendous value in understanding the underlying role of iron in the pathophysiology of these diseases. Current iron determination of total or labile iron, requires extensive sample handling and specialized instruments, whilst being time consuming and laborious. Moreover, there is minimal to no overlap between total iron and labile iron quantification methodologies-i.e. requiring entirely separate protocols, techniques and instruments. Herein, we report a unified-ferene (u-ferene) assay that enables a 2-in-1 quantification of both labile and total iron from the same preparation of a biological specimen. We demonstrate that labile iron concentrations determined from the u-ferene assay is in agreement with confocal laser scanning microscopy techniques employed within the literature. Further, this assay offers the same sensitivity as the current gold standard, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), for total iron measurements. The new u-ferene assay will have tremendous value for the wider scientific community as it offers an economic and readily accessible method for convenient 2-in-1 measurement of total and labile iron from biological samples, whilst maintaining the precision and sensitivity, as compared to ICP-MS.

Indexed as

IronAnimalsColorimetryHep G2 CellsHumansIron OverloadMiceOrgan SpecificityIron

Identifiers

PMID33727584
PMCPMC7971025
OpenAlexW3138974563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.