Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33727579›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

How and why patterns of sexual dimorphism in human faces vary across the world.

Karel Kleisner, Petr Tureček, S Craig Roberts, Jan Havlíček, Jaroslava Varella Valentova, Robert Mbe Akoko, Juan David Leongómez, Silviu Apostol, Marco A C Varella, S Adil Saribay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. The Apemen Faces Database (ApeFD).Scientific data · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Physical Strength Is Not Associated With Facial Sexual Dimorphism and Asymmetry in Either Czechs or Cameroonians.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Karel KleisnerDepartment of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. karel.kleisner@natur.cuni.cz.
Petr TurečekDepartment of Philosophy and History of Science, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
S Craig RobertsDivision of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Jan HavlíčekDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaroslava Varella ValentovaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Robert Mbe AkokoDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Management Science, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Juan David LeongómezHuman Behaviour Lab, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
Silviu ApostolDepartment of Anatomy, Animal Physiology and Biophysics, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Marco A C VarellaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
S Adil SaribayDepartment of Psychology, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Charles University · CZUniversidade de São Paulo · BRCzech Academy of Sciences · CZKadir Has University · TRUniversidad El Bosque · COUniversity of Bucharest · ROUniversity of Buea · CMUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual selection, including mate choice and intrasexual competition, is responsible for the evolution of some of the most elaborated and sexually dimorphic traits in animals. Although there is sexual dimorphism in the shape of human faces, it is not clear whether this is similarly due to mate choice, or whether mate choice affects only part of the facial shape difference between men and women. Here we explore these questions by investigating patterns of both facial shape and facial preference across a diverse set of human populations. We find evidence that human populations vary substantially and unexpectedly in both the magnitude and direction of facial sexually dimorphic traits. In particular, European and South American populations display larger levels of facial sexual dimorphism than African populations. Neither cross-cultural differences in facial shape variation, sex differences in body height, nor differing preferences for facial femininity and masculinity across countries, explain the observed patterns of facial dimorphism. Altogether, the association between sexual shape dimorphism and attractiveness is moderate for women and weak (or absent) for men. Analysis that distinguishes between allometric and non-allometric components reveals that non-allometric facial dimorphism is preferred in women's faces but not in faces of men. This might be due to different regimes of ongoing sexual selection acting on men, such as stronger intersexual selection for body height and more intense intrasexual physical competition, compared with women.

Indexed as

PhenotypeSex CharacteristicsAlgorithmsAnthropometryBeautyBiological EvolutionBiological Variation, PopulationBody HeightFaceFemaleHumansMaleModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID33727579
PMCPMC7966798
OpenAlexW3136553518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.