Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33727467›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Point-of-care rapid antigen testing for COVID-19 at a tertiary eye care facility: Role in commencement of elective surgeries, contact tracing and implementation of back-to-work policy.

Devjyoti Tripathy, Avik Kumar Roy, Rohit C Khanna, Subhadra Jalali, Bharat Panigrahy, Deepthi Chandran Parija, Suryasnata Rath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Returning to Work after the COVID-19 Pandemic Earthquake: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. COVID-19 Prevention and Control Measures in Workplace Settings: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Devjyoti TripathyFaculty, Ophthalmic Plastics, Orbit & Ocular Oncology Service, MTC Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Avik Kumar RoyFaculty, Glaucoma Service, MTC Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Rohit C KhannaDirector, Gullapalli Pratibha Rao International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eye care (GPR ICARE), LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telengana, India.
Subhadra JalaliDirector, Retina Institute, Newborn Eye Health Alliance, (NEHA) and Director- Quality, L V Prasad Eye Institute Network, KAR Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telengana, India.
Bharat PanigrahyConsultant Physician In-House, MTC Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Deepthi Chandran ParijaCommunications and Patient Care Administrator, MTC Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Suryasnata RathFaculty, Ophthalmic Plastics, Orbit & Ocular Oncology Service; Director and Taraprasad Das Chair of Ophthalmology, MTC Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to report the use and the impact of a point-of-care rapid antigen test (PoC-RAT) at a tertiary eye care facility in facilitating commencement of elective surgeries, contact tracing of exposed health care professionals (HCPs) and ancillary hospital staff, and implementation of back-to-work (BTW) policy for them.

methodsRetrospective analysis of subjects undergoing PoC-RAT for COVID-19 infection at a tertiary level dedicated eye care facility. Decision making with regard to commencement of elective surgeries post COVID-19 related discontinuation of services, contact tracing of HCPs and ancillary hospital staff exposed to known COVID-19 cases and implementation of back-to-work policy for all staff based upon the results of PoC-RAT were studied.

resultsA total of 311 subjects (224 patients and 87 hospital staff) were tested. Overall positivity rate was around 7%. Asymptomatic patients who were screened preoperatively had a lower positivity rate at around 3% compared to the staff (who were either known contacts or were symptomatic) at around 17%. Contact tracing found three-quarters of the staff at low risk and only one quarter at medium or high risk. Among patients, 97% of those followed up for at least 2 weeks after the test remained healthy. For staff, this was around 65%.

conclusionBased on our preliminary results, we suggest that PoC-RAT may be considered routinely for indication-based preoperative screening of asymptomatic patients, and for on-campus screening, contact tracing and implementation of BTW policies for HCPs and ancillary hospital staff at a tertiary level eye care facility.

Indexed as

Contact TracingElective Surgical ProceduresReturn to WorkAdultAntigens, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDecision MakingFemaleHealth PolicyHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPoint-of-Care SystemsPreoperative CareAntigens, ViralContact tracingCOVID-19elective surgerypoint-of-care rapid antigen test

Identifiers

PMID33727467
PMCPMC8012960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.