ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021
Agreement of findings of glaucoma screening between trained vision center technicians and glaucoma specialists at a tertiary hospital in South India.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seizing the silent vision loss: cost-utility analysis of population-based glaucoma screening in India.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Accuracy of trained technicians in screening orbital and adnexal diseases at rural vision centers in South India.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To study the agreement of findings of glaucoma screening between trained vision center (VC) technicians and glaucoma specialists in patients referred from VC to the glaucoma services of a tertiary eye care hospital in south India. Methods: This was a retrospective study comparing the findings of the VC technicians and the specialists of the glaucoma services in the base hospital, in patients referred from 13 VCs between January and June 2019. Medical records of 277 referred patients (out of 533 referrals) who attended the glaucoma clinic were analyzed. Results: Of the 277 patients, 111 (40%) were confirmed having glaucoma, 133 (48%) were suspects, 29 (10.4%) were normal, and four (1.4%) had other pathology. The mean age of the patients was 59.7 ± 13 years and 60.6% were females. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) measured (17 ± 7.2 mmHg at the VC and 18 ± 8.7 mmHg at the clinic, p = 0.16) and the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) (0.7 ± 0.13 at the VC and 0.6 ± 0.18 at the clinic, p = 0.57). Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement supported that mean differences were close to zero, and the intraclass correlation coefficient at 95% CI showed good consistency between the measurement of IOP (0.78 [0.74 to 0.81]) and CDR (0.90 [0.88 to 0.92]) at the base hospital and vision center. Conclusion: There is good agreement between the findings of VC technicians and glaucoma specialists. VC technicians can help in detecting glaucoma in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.