SynthesisBMJ open2021
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 809 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
809 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions to Improve Self-Care in Patients With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Gender disparities in hospital admission patterns during the COVID-19 health emergency: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for refugee, immigrant, and migrant populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview of reviews.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of COVID-19 on inflammatory bowel disease surgery: a systematic review.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Pooled it
- Understanding access to sexual and reproductive health in general practice using an adapted Candidacy Framework: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of a Standardized Community Health Worker Intervention on Health Care Utilization Within an Integrated Delivery System.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Trial
- Investigating a structured diagnostic approach for chronic breathlessness in primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Trial
- Respiratory pandemic risk in the Anthropocene: A One Health framework and GISRS+ agenda.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Economic and epidemiological burden of HPV-related diseases in the Czech Republic: A claims database analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- In uncharted territory: managing the COVID-19 pandemic in Swedish regions and municipalities from a primary health care perspective.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Impact of an Evidence-Based Emergency Department Order Set on Clinical Management of Bell's Palsy.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Performance indicators for evaluating and optimising hospital services during COVID-19: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- A Retrospective Analysis of Nearly 3,000,000 Non-COVID-19 Mid- and High-Priority Ambulance Activations Before and During COVID-19: A National Study from Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department visits in region Stockholm: a population-based study between 2018-2021.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Global Trends in Heart Failure Self-Care Research: A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Anaemia and its association with iron, vitamin BBMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Hospitalisation Burden of Human Metapneumovirus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Adults by Age and Comorbidity Status in Scotland: A Retrospective Analysis.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and short-term survival in Ireland: a population-based analysis.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Does Medicare Advantage funding disparity affect managed care insurers' profitability? Evidence from Puerto Rico.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Right-sizing Incentives.Journal of development economics · 2026Article
749 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the extent and nature of changes in utilisation of healthcare services during COVID-19 pandemic.
designSystematic review. ELIGIBILITY: Eligible studies compared utilisation of services during COVID-19 pandemic to at least one comparable period in prior years. Services included visits, admissions, diagnostics and therapeutics. Studies were excluded if from single centres or studied only patients with COVID-19. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register and preprints were searched, without language restrictions, until 10 August, using detailed searches with key concepts including COVID-19, health services and impact. DATA ANALYSIS: Risk of bias was assessed by adapting the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool, and a Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care tool. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics, graphical figures and narrative synthesis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was change in service utilisation between prepandemic and pandemic periods. Secondary outcome was the change in proportions of users of healthcare services with milder or more severe illness (eg, triage scores).
results3097 unique references were identified, and 81 studies across 20 countries included, reporting on >11 million services prepandemic and 6.9 million during pandemic. For the primary outcome, there were 143 estimates of changes, with a median 37% reduction in services overall (IQR -51% to -20%), comprising median reductions for visits of 42% (-53% to -32%), admissions 28% (-40% to -17%), diagnostics 31% (-53% to -24%) and for therapeutics 30% (-57% to -19%). Among 35 studies reporting secondary outcomes, there were 60 estimates, with 27 (45%) reporting larger reductions in utilisation among people with a milder spectrum of illness, and 33 (55%) reporting no difference.
conclusionsHealthcare utilisation decreased by about a third during the pandemic, with considerable variation, and with greater reductions among people with less severe illness. While addressing unmet need remains a priority, studies of health impacts of reductions may help health systems reduce unnecessary care in the postpandemic recovery. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203729.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.