Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33727273›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2021

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review.

Ray Moynihan, Sharon Sanders, Zoe A Michaleff, Anna Mae Scott, Justin Clark, Emma J To, Mark Jones, Eliza Kitchener, Melissa Fox, Minna Johansson and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 809 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
809citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

809 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The impact of COVID-19 on inflammatory bowel disease surgery: a systematic review.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Right-sizing Incentives.Journal of development economics · 2026
    Article

749 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ray MoynihanInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia raymoynihan@bond.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-742X
Sharon SandersInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Zoe A MichaleffInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0360-4956
Anna Mae ScottInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0109-9001
Justin ClarkInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Emma J ToCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mark JonesInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Eliza KitchenerFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Melissa FoxHealth Consumers Queensland, Adelaide, Queensland, Queensland.
Minna JohanssonCochrane Sustainable Healthcare Field, Lund, Sweden.
Eddy LangCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0850-4337
Anne DugganAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ian ScottInternal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Princess Alexander Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7596-0837
Loai AlbarqouniInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4114-9106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the extent and nature of changes in utilisation of healthcare services during COVID-19 pandemic.

designSystematic review. ELIGIBILITY: Eligible studies compared utilisation of services during COVID-19 pandemic to at least one comparable period in prior years. Services included visits, admissions, diagnostics and therapeutics. Studies were excluded if from single centres or studied only patients with COVID-19. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register and preprints were searched, without language restrictions, until 10 August, using detailed searches with key concepts including COVID-19, health services and impact. DATA ANALYSIS: Risk of bias was assessed by adapting the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool, and a Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care tool. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics, graphical figures and narrative synthesis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was change in service utilisation between prepandemic and pandemic periods. Secondary outcome was the change in proportions of users of healthcare services with milder or more severe illness (eg, triage scores).

results3097 unique references were identified, and 81 studies across 20 countries included, reporting on >11 million services prepandemic and 6.9 million during pandemic. For the primary outcome, there were 143 estimates of changes, with a median 37% reduction in services overall (IQR -51% to -20%), comprising median reductions for visits of 42% (-53% to -32%), admissions 28% (-40% to -17%), diagnostics 31% (-53% to -24%) and for therapeutics 30% (-57% to -19%). Among 35 studies reporting secondary outcomes, there were 60 estimates, with 27 (45%) reporting larger reductions in utilisation among people with a milder spectrum of illness, and 33 (55%) reporting no difference.

conclusionsHealthcare utilisation decreased by about a third during the pandemic, with considerable variation, and with greater reductions among people with less severe illness. While addressing unmet need remains a priority, studies of health impacts of reductions may help health systems reduce unnecessary care in the postpandemic recovery. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203729.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsDelivery of Health CareHealth ServicesHumansPatient Acceptance of Health Careepidemiologyhealth policyorganisation of health servicespublic healthquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID33727273
PMCPMC7969768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.