Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33727261›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Prognostic Value of ER and PgR Expression and the Impact of Multi-clonal Expression for Recurrence in Ductal Carcinoma

Mangesh A Thorat, Pauline M Levey, J Louise Jones, Sarah E Pinder, Nigel J Bundred, Ian S Fentiman, Jack Cuzick

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Prognostic and Predictive Value of HER2 Expression in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Results from the UK/ANZ DCIS Randomized Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Can We Interpret Analyses of Etiologic Heterogeneity When Molecular Markers Are Used to Classify Tumors?Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Associated with Outcomes after In Situ Breast Disease.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mangesh A ThoratCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom. m.thorat@qmul.ac.uk thoratmangesh@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8673-5320
Pauline M LeveyBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
J Louise JonesBarts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah E PinderSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nigel J BundredManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6007-056X
Jack CuzickCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7420-7512
Queen Mary University of London · GBKing's College London · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16891Cancer Research UK A12061Cancer Research UK A16891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe prognostic value of estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PgR) expression in ductal carcinoma EXPERIMENTAL

designFormalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues were collected from UK/ANZ DCIS trial participants (

resultsER expression was multi-clonal in 11% (39/356) of ER-positive (70.6%, 356/504) patients. Ipsilateral breast event (IBE) risk was similarly higher in ER-multi-clonal and ER-negative DCIS as compared with DCIS with uni-clonal ER expression. ER-negative DCIS (clonal) had a higher risk of

conclusionsER expression is a strong predictor of ipsilateral recurrence risk in DCIS. ER-positive DCIS with distinct ER-negative clones has a recurrence risk similar to ER-negative DCIS. ER should be routinely assessed in DCIS, and ER scoring should take clonality of expression into account.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID33727261
PMCPMC7611296
OpenAlexW3135957257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.