Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33727245›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2021

National movement patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand: the unexplored role of neighbourhood deprivation.

Malcolm Campbell, Lukas Marek, Jesse Wiki, Matthew Hobbs, Clive E Sabel, John McCarthy, Simon Kingham

Open access · hybridAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Malcolm CampbellSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand Malcolm.Campbell@Canterbury.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-7975-4662
Lukas MarekGeoHealth Laboratory, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5473-8930
Jesse WikiGeoHealth Laboratory, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-687X
Matthew HobbsGeoHealth Laboratory, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8398-7485
Clive E SabelDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9180-4861
John McCarthyNew Zealand Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand.
Simon KinghamSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2869-3756
University of Canterbury · NZAarhus University · DKMinistry of Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has asked unprecedented questions of governments around the world. Policy responses have disrupted usual patterns of movement in society, locally and globally, with resultant impacts on national economies and human well-being. These interventions have primarily centred on enforcing lockdowns and introducing social distancing recommendations, leading to questions of trust and competency around the role of institutions and the administrative apparatus of state. This study demonstrates the unequal societal impacts in population movement during a national 'lockdown'.

methodsWe use nationwide mobile phone movement data to quantify the effect of an enforced lockdown on population mobility by neighbourhood deprivation using an ecological study design. We then derive a mobility index using anonymised aggregated population counts for each neighbourhood (2253 Census Statistical Areas; mean population n=2086) of national hourly mobile phone location data (7.45 million records, 1 March 2020-20 July 2020) for New Zealand (NZ).

resultsCurtailing movement has highlighted and exacerbated underlying social and spatial inequalities. Our analysis reveals the unequal movements during 'lockdown' by neighbourhood socioeconomic status in NZ.

conclusionIn understanding inequalities in neighbourhood movements, we are contributing critical new evidence to the policy debate about the impact(s) and efficacy of national, regional or local lockdowns which have sparked such controversy.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlHumansNew ZealandSARS-CoV-2deprivationneighborhood/placepublic healthpublic health policyspatial analysis

Identifiers

PMID33727245
PMCPMC8372376
OpenAlexW3138565585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.