Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33726817›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2021

Patient-partner engagement at the Centre de recherche du CHUS in the Province of Québec, Canada: from an intuitive methodology to outreach after three years of implementation.

Denis Boutin, Susan C Mastine, Luc Beaubien, Maryse Berthiaume, Denise Boilard, Jaime Borja, Edouard Botton, Janie Boulianne-Gref, Sylvie Breton, Christian-Alexandre Castellano and 25 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Patient engagement in health implementation research: A logic model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Denis BoutinCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Susan C MastineCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Luc BeaubienCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Maryse BerthiaumeCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Denise BoilardCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Jaime BorjaCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Edouard BottonCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Janie Boulianne-GrefCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Sylvie BretonCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Christian-Alexandre CastellanoCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Gisèle CharpentierCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Francois-Pierre CounilCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Josée CozmanoCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Pierre DagenaisCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Guy DrouinFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Josée FortierCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Caroline FrancoeurDirection de la coordination de la mission universitaire, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et des Services Sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Louise GagnéCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
David HéraudCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Denise HêtuCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Pier HoudeCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Ginette LadouceurCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Marjolaine LandryCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Elisabeth LeblancCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Christine LoignonCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Valéry LussierDirection de la coordination de la mission universitaire, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et des Services Sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Annie MorinCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Nathalie OuelletCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Claude QuintinCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Avinash RamnarineCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Catherine WilhelmyCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Amy SvotelisCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Ève ThibaultCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
William D FraserCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Claude BattistaCentre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada. Marie-Claude.Battista@USherbrooke.ca.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières · CA

Funding

Centre de recherche du CHUS N/AUniversité de Sherbrooke - Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences - Patient-Partner Initiative N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical societies and funding agencies strongly recommend that patients be included as partners in research publications and grant applications. Although this "top-down" approach is certainly efficient at forcing this new and desirable type of collaboration, our past experience demonstrated that it often results in an ambiguous relationship as not yet well integrated into the cultures of either patients' or the researchers'. The question our group raised from this observation was: "How to generate a cultural shift toward a fruitful and long-lasting collaboration between patients and researchers? A "bottom-up" approach was key to our stakeholders. The overall objective was to build a trusting and bidirectional-ecosystem between patients and researchers. The specific objectives were to document: 1) the steps that led to the development of the first patient-partner strategic committee within a research center in the Province of Québec; 2) the committee's achievements after 3 years.

methodsEighteen volunteer members, 12 patient-partners and 6 clinician/institutional representatives, were invited to represent the six research themes of the Centre de recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS) (Quebec, Canada). Information on the services offered by Committee was disseminated internally and to external partners. Committee members satisfaction was evaluated.

resultsFrom May 2017 to April 2020, members attended 29 scheduled and 6 ad hoc meetings and contributed to activities requiring over 1000 h of volunteer time in 2018-2019 and 1907 h in the 2019-2020 period. The Committee's implication spanned governance, expertise, and knowledge transfer in research. Participation in these activities increased annually at local, provincial, national and international levels. The Patient-Partner Committee collaborated with various local (n = 7), provincial (n = 6) and national (n = 4) partners. Member satisfaction with the Committee's mandate and format was 100%.

conclusionsThe CRCHUS co-constructed a Patient-Partner Strategic Committee which resulted in meaningful bilateral, trusting and fruitful collaborations between patients, researchers and partners. The "bottom-up" approach - envisioned and implemented by the Committee, where the expertise and the needs of patients complemented those of researchers, foundations, networks and decision-makers - is key to the success of a cultural shift. The CRCHUS Committee created a hub to develop the relevant intrinsic potential aimed at changing the socio-cultural environment of science.

Indexed as

ContributionGovernancePartnershipPatient and public involvementPatient engagementPatients networkingResearch

Identifiers

PMID33726817
PMCPMC7962081
OpenAlexW3138478815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.